Have you bought Civilization VII?

Have you bought Civilization VII


  • Total voters
    194
Joined
Oct 23, 2011
Messages
2,062
Simple question really - there's been lots of debate around the release about the new mechanics, and the state of the release.

I'm intrigued to see how many fanatics have and haven't bought the game yet. Feel free to post why too.
 
Simple question really - there's been lots of debate around the release about the new mechanics, and the state of the release.

I'm intrigued to see how many fanatics have and haven't bought the game yet. Feel free to post why too.

I bought it. Why? Because I wanted to play it.

I played it. I like it. I'm enjoying it, and sharing that enjoyment with my friends. So far, the money has already been well worth it.
 
No, because I don't like the way they set up Civ Swichting (Leaders and Civs should match) and I have the impression, the game is not a sandbox anymore, where you can explore and build your empire on your pace, and don't have to follow arbitrary timelines. Map selections seem therefore also to be quiet limited. Seems to me, you play the game more or less the same way every time, I can not imagine, how this can keep you motivated in the long run. Waiting if DLCs/ Patches will change my mind eventually, but as of now, I don't think I will buy this game anytime in the near future.
 
Not buying anytime in the foreseeable future, if ever. Except for navigable rivers and commanders, practically every change is exactly what I do not want in a Civilization game. It’s as if Firaxis’ design document was a list of things I don’t want.
 
Not buying anytime in the foreseeable future, if ever. Except for navigable rivers and commanders, practically every change is exactly what I do not want in a Civilization game. It’s as if Firaxis’ design document was a list of things I don’t want.
+1 except not that fussed for commanders cant name them, there appartently OP, I also enjoyed leveling and specialising my troops.

My civ group, 3 other teds have also decided not to buy so defo no reason now as can carry on Civ 6 MP
 
Yeah I bought it after I said, pre release, that there was almost no chance I would. (I had the exact same concerns as ColtSeavers). Well, a few days before early release, I happened to get pretty sick and was going to be home a while. So I couldn't resist and bought it.

I should have resisted. Worst game in the series.

Playing a few full rounds, giving it a chance, did take a while. Overall a relatively cheap way to pass the time/ignore the pain I was in. (60 hours, 120$ version.) I have zero urge to play anymore (compared to thousands of hours into every game since 3) and I don't expect this game to be fixed.
 
Haven't bought it. I'm torn. I like a lot, the vast majority of what I've seen as changes. But.

I love the age system as a concept (and leaders detached from civs, and the leader selection is good), but it requires a *much* larger and much more diverse civ selection to realize its potential, and right now, not only does it not have that, but there are some very concerning signs that the Devs intend to waste design space on adding another age where half the civs would just be repeat of already-existing Modern civs (eg, Prussia/Germany, Russia/USSR, Ggreat Britain/UK, French Empire/France, and the worst offender of all, America/USA).

Additionally, the lack of support for larger map and messaging around it of the "We recommend you play on even smaller maps than the largest currently available even if you like larger maps" type is just galling me the wrong way - it comes off as a condescending push toward fast conflict-oriented games at the expanse of, you know, actually *building your empire*. I'm notably less than interested in that push, and until they rectify the problem with bigger maps, the game is not for me. IT'S not the first time (Civ VI was already trending that way) the Devs come off as having a massive "real civ is played on duel in a couple of hours" blinders on, and it's the antithesis of everything I like about the game.

In the same vein, the now well documented use of ridiculous level of forward settling by the AI, which falls right into the same mentality of "You're here for empire building? Nah, we've decided what you need is conflict" game design approach. Really not into that version of it either.

Finally, though I am loathe to mention it...while I am not fully boycotting (also it's nearly impossible) I am scrutinizing purchase from American companies a *lot* more than usual given current events, and it would take a far more intense "must have" of a game to justify this expenditure right now. Civ IV was the last Civ I felt that way about, not because it was necessarily a better game, but because my interests have evolved to the point where Civ is...a franchise I really like that still gives me many hours of fun, but I have other games I can play that will also do that.

Unless we see some major change or good news on the first three points, it feels unlikely I'll buy the game, and even then I may still wait until the current nonsense finally calms down.
 
It was gifted to me on Christmas.
 
There are so many things I could spend my time and money on, and lots of other great games I could play. So Civ 7 must clear a high bar for me to choose to spend my time and money on it. Maybe it will clear that bar one day, but it is not yet on my radar. I am enjoying these forums though. It is nice to see civil discourse showcasing various opinions.
 
Bought it and been playing since the start of "advanced access".It is in no way flawless but i love what we already have and am excited for what is on the way (Carthage :) and maybe a Greek leader sooner rather than later?🤞). My main reservations were eras and CIV switching but after having played several games, they are not game breaking for me.
 
Bought it, playing it, enjoying it more than I enjoyed Civ 6 or Civ 5. That would make it my favorite since 4, even in its current state where I curse the UX under my breath every few turns.
 
I've never felt the one-more-turn as strongly as with Civ VII, even in it's somewhat unfinished and certainly unpolished state. Zero regrets here.

I think that given time, this will easily become the best game in the franchise.
 
I hummed and hawed about it for a while before release, but—conscious of its well-known flaws—I bought it and I'm having about as much fun with it as I did with V on release of Brave New World, and VI with Gathering Storm and the New Frontier Pass. I think that's a pretty good sign.
 
I did buy it, about a week after release. Honestly, even though I was sort of mixed on it (as were the reviews), I felt like I had spend so much time reading about it I might as well try it myself.

Haven't made it through a full game yet - currently in the modern era. Party because I've been very busy and partly because I haven't found the game super compelling. Will probably play through another game potentially, and then circle back in six months.
 
Seems to me, you play the game more or less the same way every time, I can not imagine, how this can keep you motivated in the long run.
I feel really bad for anyone who formed this opinion without actually playing the game. My experience with the game has been the complete opposite. Every single civ/leader combo I've tried played vastly differently.

People seem to have this misguided opinion that just because the milestones page exists in the game, that you are forced to follow those objectives. You absolutely are not. The sandbox is still there if you just...let it. Free your mind and the rest will follow
 
Not buying it yet, at least going to wait until it's on sale, if not for some DLC. Sadly most games these days are half-baked at release and the reviews so far are too mixed for me to justify it. Will definitely buy it once it's cheaper and/or it has some DLC to patch it.
 
got the founders edition. the civ series holds a special place in my heart and as much as i was disappointed with civ 6, i had to give 7 a chance. so glad i did
 
Back
Top Bottom