skadistic
Caomhanach
Acorrding to the RIAA when you get the Al Gore internet the bonuses from music and movies should be reduced to almost nothing.
Venger said:This is in my opinion the single gayest concept Civ has ever seen. Of all the things added in Civ4, and I love 90% of them, this is probably King Goofy.
Venger
henry k c said:How do you trade a movie, really.
Multiplicity said:That is what you would call... globalism. A movie is a good, like computers, cars, etc. It can be exported to other countries or imported by other countries.
Venger said:Sorry, just find the concept in general lame. Just my opinion. I don't need a Playstation wonder, I don't need a Pokemon tile improvement, not interested in building a Gamestop building in every city, or holding out for the Netflix wonder that puts a Blockbuster in every city... it seems so utterly banal, so un-Civ like to me. Pop culture as commodity and in fact tradeable luxury seems misplaced and too self-aware of current times - gems and gold have been traded for centuries, whereas I can get the Jean Claude Van Damme collection for $5 a movie at Wal Mart.
Efexeye said:What exactly makes this concept homosexual?
Rellik said:crazy stuff
its like being a Canadian living in the Vancouver area and finding yourself in the US Seattle area because "Wake me up when September ends" tore up the pop charts and the borders got pushed up.
joequality said:Jimmy Hendrix
henry k c said:This is a good idea: once you research movie pirating you can steal movies from other civs for free.
DBear said:Hollywood should increase corruption and raise war weariness
crazybeard said:That may be true of recent film trends, but back in the 40s, Hollywood was used for precisely the opposite. Gung-ho movies (like the original Gung Ho), training films provided to the armed forces at no charge, and of course, the USO, which brought movie stars out to the sioldiers.
With very recent entries such as Band of Brothers and Jarhead, we may be seeing a rebirth of the collaboration between Hollywood and the military.
damxam said:Maybe he liked the concept and meant it was the happiest concept of all in Civ4.
Skedastic said:I still simply don't understand. You are not building Pokemon and Netflix and Blockbuster and playstations and so on, you're builing three fairly generic items meant to represent modern non-necessity, cultural products. Those items pre-date lots of other canonical Civ concepts like nuclear technology, jet fighters --- and spaceships to Alpha Centauri! --- so it isn't clear why you're upset about them but not these other Civ concepts. Sure, you can buy DVDs at Walmart; you can also buy all sorts of other stuff in the game, like many of the food products, at Walmart. The fact that the cultural commodities are commonly purchased in modern society whereas gold, gems, incense and suchlike are relatively esoteric strikes me as a reason to put them in the game, not exclude them.
Inflammatory said:Trading hit singles... Isn't that what they do on DC?
Venger said:This is in my opinion the single gayest concept Civ has ever seen. Of all the things added in Civ4, and I love 90% of them, this is probably King Goofy.
Venger