He was an absolute monarch in every sense of the word...Was he a dictator? Certainly much less a dictator than absolute rulers before him and in other countries.
He was an absolute monarch in every sense of the word...![]()
He crowned himself Emperor, actually, and there's not a whole lot to argue for the claim that Napoleon was ever antimonarchical at any point in his career.Considering that he had himself crowned king of France when he was supposed to be against Monarchy.
He crowned himself Emperor, actually, and there's not a whole lot to argue for the claim that Napoleon was ever antimonarchical at any point in his career.
He had no goals.He fell short of the goals.
"Much less of a dictator?" Right.
He was an absolute monarch in every sense of the word...
Considering that he had himself crowned king of France
He crowned himself Emperor, actually
Stalin.You know any dictator who contributed as much and in as many countries to the development of law, economy & education as Napoleon did?
Napoleon also initiated one of the bloodiest waves of conflict in European history, considered himself to be above the rules of diplomacy, re-established a military aristocracy in France, ruined the economies of the European states by subordinating them to his war machine, and deserved every bit of what happened to him in 1812-5.You know any dictator who contributed as much and in as many countries to the development of law, economy & education as Napoleon did?
Napoleon also preserved - even restored - many of the achievements of the first - most productive, least bloody - phases of the French Revolution.
When it comes to law - his Code Civil from 1804 was an innovative and modern codification of private law compared to those in other countries of that time. Also his Code Penal from 1810 - although not as modern as his Code Civil - is considered as one of the first modern codifications of criminal law.
Notably, I didn't specify what kind of emperor he crowned himself. But yes, that's correct. It's also irrelevant.Domen said:He didn't crown himself king of France and he didn't crown himself emperor of France.
He crowned himself emperor of the French - not of France.
But he was still short! *rimshot*He had no goals.
You know any dictator who contributed as much and in as many countries to the development of law, economy & education as Napoleon did?
Exactly. He was quite open about his intention to give the Grand Duchy to Alexander in exchange for peace; he was even enthusiastic about the prospect, since it would make Prussia more dependent upon him while he marshalled his troops for another attack on Russia.Of course, the fact that a Pole would be giving a panegyric to Napoleon is roughly as surprising as a Brit harping on the genius of Wellington. I personally feel sorry for you - Napoleon hoodwinked and betrayed the Poles as viciously as any of the Partitioners - but it is what it is.