IglooDude said:Having read the article, I can't see any basis for labelling Howard Dean as "intolerant of gays" any more than I can label George Bush as being "intolerant of a secure homeland" because he got a new Homeland Security Dept Inspector General.
LGBTQ? What is that?Che Guava said:Agreed. It's a pretty weak charge. It would be nice to see a party like the Democrats embrace LGBTQ issues a little more, but if you're looking to regain the HoR, the senate and the whitehouse, its probably not a good idea to start drawing lines in the sand
CivGeneral said:Well, I can tell Howard Dean is certanly not a Catholic. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches Catholics to accept Gays as regular people and that any unjust discrimination against them is wrong.
Makes me wonder if there is a middle ground party for my views since I do have stances some from the Republican Party as well as the Democratic party.
Dean immediately hired gay former Democratic Party operative Brian Bond to replace Hitchcock as executive director of the party's Gay Lesbian Leadership Council, according to DNC spokesperson Karen Finney, who called Bond a "proven leader."
That is true. Both parties are hunting down phonies. Democrats hunting down Democrats in Name Only and Republicans hunting down Republicans in Name Only.capslock said:Only if they are republicans.
He is, after all, the former Vermont Governor who gladly signed the country's first Civil Unions bill into law.
CivGeneral said:Pro-life and against abortions
Neomega said:From the article
"Dean immediately hired gay former Democratic Party operative Brian Bond to replace Hitchcock as executive director of the party's Gay Lesbian Leadership Council, according to DNC spokesperson Karen Finney, who called Bond a "proven leader."
case closed.
Umm, its not the same thing. One can be pro-life on abortions but still support the death penalty and vice-versa. Pro-life does not have to be restricted to just abortions why, even a pro-lifer can be against the death penalty and for abortions.adog said:Umm, that's the same thing.
CivGeneral said:Umm, its not the same thing. One can be pro-life on abortions but still support the death penalty and vice-versa. Pro-life does not have to be restricted to just abortions why, even a pro-lifer can be against the death penalty and for abortions.
Pro-life, in my definition, is an umbrella term for the respect and preservation of human life from conception to grave.
Whateveradog said:You're second paragraph just contradicted you're first one.