If we make bunnybears, we could reshoot parts of the Quest for the Holy Grail (with an M rating) for those who didn't get the joke about the rabbit.
skadistic said:
Interesting.
Since most carbon based organisms share a vast majority of genetics (more so 'tween animals and animals then plants and animals) at some point you get down to basics and it doesn't matter where the particular genetics come from? The closer geneticly you get like say a baboon and human the less divergence you get in genetic code hence a better chance for success? Am I thinking to far down the viability line since stem cells are preaty much undefined cells that can be teased to become whatever?
Well, a stem cell can be teased to become whatever cell the DNA is for. A human stem cell can become a human brain cell, but a rodent stem cell would remain a rodent brain cell.
However, (since we are actually so similar) you can put human brain cells into damaged regions of a rat's brain, and the human brain cells will heal into the rat brain and help restore function. Even though the cells are decently different, genetically, they're similar enough to do each other's job.
But, with your baboon example (but I'll use chimp, though), they are very similar genetically - amazingly so. I have a feeling that a chimp embryo could be encouraged to become
very similar to a human being, if it was nurtured the right way in the womb. Especially if we were able to tweak a couple places in the DNA.
I remember an article which looked at the genes
active in the human brain, and how apes didn't have those genes
active, but seemed to have the genes in their DNA.
I might be answering the wrong question, though. If you're asking if a baboon egg might be better to make these cells (for use in humans) than a cow ... I would guess yes.