I have an idea when capturing cities...

[warpstorm]

Originally posted by Panzershreck
how about when you capture a city and there is resistance, how about your units in that city might lose some health...like whats happening in Iraq...

Probably not the best example. Losing one or two every few days out of roughly 150,000 stationed in Iraq isn't very a major attrition rate. There are many better examples in history.

 

[Civrules]

It can't go back because you destroy it.

 

[Civrules]

I am not saying that it is a stupid idea.
Hmm, lets think. What if the population goes to the nerest city of their own country?

 

[Civrules]

Kinda.

Darn, you respond fast...

 

[Civrules]

In regular Civ the population of the city just goes homeless.

I guess there is no point in that.

 

[Civrules]

What if the population becomes slaves for you?

 

[Civrules]

But we never destroyed any of their cities, right? We bombed them but never FULLY destroyed them.

Usually, when you destroy a city you don't like the people in that city.

 

[Civrules]

You are like an eagle. Circling this thread..

Well, anyway, I think we came up with some good ideas.

 

[trumpeteer]

I like #1 but I'm not quite sure what you mean about 2. I do believe, though, that they've already put C3C into production.

 

[trumpeteer]

Perhaps some of the pop could become workers in the next closest city? Or would just extra population be more realistic?

 

[trumpeteer]

Yeah. Perhaps about 30% when you occupy a city, and about 70% when you raze it? Does that sound reasonable?

 

[trumpeteer]

Man! I can't leave this thread for a second without five more posts popping up!

 

[trumpeteer]

And I've counted the posts up to this point.

Civrules: 7
Me: 4
Warpstorm: 1
Panzershreck: 13!!!

You got every other post!

Don't add to the spam.

-- Chieftess

 

[Panzershreck]

how about when you capture a city and there is resistance, how about your units in that city might lose some health...like whats happening in Iraq...and if you disband that city during the war they go back to their former owner

just a thought

 

[Panzershreck]

i mean that if you capture a city from the Russians and then you later abandon that city then it would go back to the Russians...but now that i think about that idea is a little stupid so just scratch that...nm

 

[Panzershreck]

i know...it was a stupid idea.

 

[Panzershreck]

like refugees?

 

[Panzershreck]

im superhuman

but yeah refugees would be a good idea

 

[Panzershreck]

yeah

 

[Panzershreck]

i dont know, workers would be a good idea but so would population. would it be the entire population of the destroyed city or just a fraction, like say 30-50%. Also what about refugees when you raze a city too? i think that would be logical, dont u?