TheMeInTeam
If A implies B...
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2008
- Messages
- 27,995
I think dissonance is the "natural" response. You really have to be vigilant and actively resist it. Its not easy at all, so I try not to fault people too much when they can't or won't resist that tendancy.
For sure, noticing it at all is the hardest part of the process, and requires the most vigilance. Looking at what we actually choose independent from self-perceived motivation is the closest we can get to an objective look at ourselves, and this *should* define our self-narrative. OP kind of glosses over the crucial "noticing it at all" part, as there's in implicit assumption you're already aware of the incoherence. Otherwise it wouldn't be possible to make a value judgment on its existence.
Noticing it in others is of course easier, though perhaps carries something of a reverse bias compared to analyzing self.
To clarify, the annoyance for me comes in when evidence is presented (in this case, the evidence is a simple look at what someone actually chooses), yet people do not update beliefs in accordance with track record.
This reminds me of the movie Office Space when they are asking each other "What would you do if you had a million dollars" and the first guy starts talking about all the ways he would invest it to make more money. The second guy yells at him and tells him that's not the point of the exercise as you're supposed to say what you would actually do. But I always thought that was wrong. I think it just meant that the Samir character should be a investment banker or stockbroker, because that was obviously what he would like doing if he had the money to do it.
One doesn't really know until the scenario presents, but it's definitely a reasonable answer even in the context of the movie. It's the first thing that came to that character's mind, and if he actually invested it upon getting a million dollars then it would be a good guess.