BvBPL
Pour Decision Maker
I would like to know if there ever been any ruling on whether if any newspaper isn't or is obligated to grant people's rights to post on their website anonymously?
There probably is nothing of that which exist.
You’re probably right that this hasn’t been tested in the courts, but there is no reason to assume that newspapers, or any other publisher, do not have the right to exclude anonymous comments from their websites. Newspapers can already, and do, state that they will not publish anonymous letters to the editor, and websites also oblige posters to maintain a standard of conduct and threaten posters with deletion if they fail to do so. There’s no reason why such a standard of conduct cannot include stating one’s full name and agreeing to have it published.
Furthermore, you do not have a “right” to post to a newspaper’s web page. The newspaper may extend you a privilege to do so, but they can (usually) revoke it at any time.
--
Just for clarification: you do have a right to publish anonymously. You do not have an absolute right to do so using someone else’s hardware (printing press or internet web page), although the owner of such hardware may extend that privilege to you.
A newspaper may protect the anonymity of anything you publish anonymously on its website against subpoena or other disclosure, but this protection is granted through state level shield laws, not federal or constitutional law, so the actual protection granted may vary from locale to locale. Also, since such protection is granted through media shield laws, it is possible that your anonymous post on a newspaper’s website may be protected, but your blog or your forum post might not receive the same protection.