Lotus49, It's in the Bible, look it up, sheesh
1.417 x 10^32 degrees C/K... 5.391 x 10^-44 seconds after the Big Bang just isn't good enough. I want to know what the 'absolute maximum' temperature was at the very instant of creation. Unlimited? Inexplicable? Here we are in this darn numerical Pi-type situation again. Science "just can't say". Blast!
Nobody knows whether Big Bang = creation. It actually likely wasn't.
Decibels are indeed a logarithmic scale, with each full 'bell' being 10x the intensity of the previous one. So, 20 decibels is 10x the intensity of 10 decibels. The intensities of the deci- parts are all arranged on a nice logarithmic curve.No, the difference between .1 and .2 is .1, not 10, units. When you multiply integers by a constant, u have a logrithmic scale.
Alright then, well at least tell me whether or not all the growing/strengthening dark energy is going to ultimately validate the Big Rip hypothesis.
*cough* and if so, what will the temperature then be when it's all lights out, and there's no more atoms/particles (matter/dark matter/antimatter etc.) at all anymore to maintain zero degrees Kelvin?
Alright then, well at least tell me whether or not all the growing/strengthening dark energy is going to ultimately validate the Big Rip hypothesis.
*cough* and if so, what will the temperature then be when it's all lights out, and there's no more atoms/particles (matter/dark matter/antimatter etc.) at all anymore to maintain zero degrees Kelvin?
Depending on the scale used. Although 233 kelvins is equal to -40 C. So looks like we were both wrong, lousy math skills . . .
Rankine's getting no lovin' in this thread![]()
I guess we'd have to ask the Canadians and the Alaskans. I'm sure they'll both say that "-40 is not really all that cold"
Rankine's getting no lovin' in this thread![]()
Aha! Not so fast. 233 Kelvin would be slightly cooler (0.15) degrees cooler than -40C.
I round once, and everyone complains . . .
In the first world, we call it .35F cooler.![]()