MamboJoel
Cool.
I was reading another forum, and watched Inqvisitor refer repeatedly to someone as a "Paki" despite the protestations that the man was from India.
Who's Inqvisitor ?
I was reading another forum, and watched Inqvisitor refer repeatedly to someone as a "Paki" despite the protestations that the man was from India.
AL_DA_GREAT said:THe n word is the correct way in english to reffer to a black person. Just because they where treated badly doesn't mean they need their names changed. We treat dogs badly but when are we going to reffer to them as a four legged individual. (note I am not comparing black people to animals and I am not racist because of skin colour)
rmsharpe said:That is true. Largely before the 20th century, that word was considered neutral and only meant to denote a person's race.
I did not suggest that the word should be used in a contemporary setting, I was in agreement with the idea that the word did not initally carry as many (if any at all) negative connotations with it.You almost have a point there rms, but your still ignorant of the fact that black people were considered and treated as less humans, yes the only thing it was derived from was the description of their skin color and not in a neutrel fashion.
I'm brown. Thus I can never be rascist. A nice little benefit eh?
Who's Inqvisitor ?
Ah, ok, had me worried for a second there.Making a comment on political correctness.
I do not believe there are words that are offensive no matter what. It's always a matter of context: who said it, how it was said, and why it was said.
Shazbot!
Oh, what you said!
I disagree w/ those who said the "n-word" meant something different in the 1800s. Its always been a term of disparagement. Now, use of the word "negro", that maybe what you're confusing it with.
The first rule of communication is KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE. It is incumbent on the speaker, not the audience, make adjustments. This, of course, assumes you want to effectively communicate your message.
rmsharpe said:I did not suggest that the word should be used in a contemporary setting, I was in agreement with the idea that the word did not initally carry as many (if any at all) negative connotations with it.
As far as the U.S. goes C--- is still the most offensive word I think.
As far as the U.S. goes C--- is still the most offensive word I think.
That is true. Largely before the 20th century, that word was considered neutral and only meant to denote a person's race.
I'm brown. Thus I can never be rascist. A nice little benefit eh?
The first rule of communication is KNOW YOUR AUDIENCE. It is incumbent on the speaker, not the audience, make adjustments. This, of course, assumes you want to effectively communicate your message.