• We are currently performing site maintenance, parts of civfanatics are currently offline, but will come back online in the coming days. For more updates please see here.

Is Bestiality Wrong?

Status
Not open for further replies.
how would you know that the dog wouldnt like it?
 
I know i'm making an ass out of u and me when i assume, but if you would rape a dog i would put money on the dog trying to get away from you.

well what if the dog is in heat, and you dont have any male dogs/dont want it to get pregnant. then would it try to run away?
 
well what if the dog is in heat, and you dont have any male dogs/dont want it to get pregnant. then would it try to run away?

First of all I'm still wondering why you are defending having sex with animals so vigorously. Second if it is smaller i'm sure it would as there are several men that would rip up a smaller dog.
 
First of all I'm still wondering why you are defending having sex with animals so vigorously. Second if it is smaller i'm sure it would as there are several men that would rip up a smaller dog.

the reason im defending it is that because i find it extremely hypocritical that ppl are ok with using animals as beast of burden and ppl are ok with eating and killing animals but find having sex with them completely immoral.


i wanna know why you hate it so much? is it cuz you just couldnt live up to satisifying your animal partner? found out it was cheating on you? or are you one of those people that ripped up a small dog?

edit: lets assume its a big dog. im also defending it because altough its gross its not that big a deal to me.
 
the reason im defending it is that because i find it extremely hypocritical that ppl are ok with using animals as beast of burden and ppl are ok with eating and killing animals but find having sex with them completely immoral.


i wanna know why you hate it so much? is it cuz you just couldnt live up to satisifying your animal partner? found out it was cheating on you? or are you one of those people that ripped up a small dog?

Read my earlier post to see why i think its wrong, but a summary is if you do it, it is sick and you're breaking a cultural taboo so i have every right to find it sick. However using them as beast of burden and eating are NOT taboo so they are okay.
 
Read my earlier post to see why i think its wrong, but a summary is if you do it, it is sick and you're breaking a cultural taboo so i have every right to find it sick. However using them as beast of burden and eating are NOT taboo so they are okay.

cuz were an advanced species? LAME
 
You're saying you can't control your urge to mount a goat? LAME

when did i say that? are you trying to create a strawman?or are you trying to attacke me personally instead of my arguments? they are both very desperate regardless of which you are doing, grow a pair and when you get pzwned just admit it.:)
 
No its just why usually the guy who says "Its okay to mount goats" does it himself. If that isin't true why do you defend the right to have sex with any animal.

EDIT: I don't mean that as a flame and personal attack, it is just when you defend like this you're making it sound like you practice it.
 
No its just why usually the guy who says "Its okay to mount goats" does it himself. If that isin't true why do you defend the right to have sex with any animal.

EDIT: I don't mean that as a flame and personal attack, it is just when you defend like this you're making it sound like you practice it.

i also dont drink or smoke but i still think ppl should be allowed to those things(which are prolly more harmful than bestiality).
 
i also dont drink or smoke but i still think ppl should be allowed to those things(which are prolly more harmful than bestiality).

Alright, its obvious your not going to see that it is sick and i'm sure as hell never going to approve having sex with animals so lets call a truce since it is almost 1 A.M. here and i am tired, if you want to fight about this i'm sure there are people from earlier times you can.

So how bout it we agree to disagree?
 
Alright, its obvious your not going to see that it is sick and i'm sure as hell never going to approve having sex with animals so lets call a truce since it is almost 1 A.M. here and i am tired, if you want to fight about this i'm sure there are people from earlier times you can.

So how bout it we agree to disagree?

fyi it is gross and sick but you should still be allowed to do it IMHO. but ok i guess we can agree to disagree:)
 
the reason im defending it is that because i find it extremely hypocritical that ppl are ok with using animals as beast of burden and ppl are ok with eating and killing animals but find having sex with them completely immoral.

Beast of burden = benefits people and possibly society because it aids in the production of something useful.

Eating and killing = benefits people and society because people need to eat. I am ignoring the obvious vegetarian argument. (But if you are a vegetarian I would assume you would find bestiality wrong for a variety of reasons)

Having Sex = unhealthy, morally repugnant, gross, and in general a violation of the animal's "rights" (yes nebulous I know) that would not be outweighed by any of the benefits discussed in the above things people do to animals.

This is one of those things that shouldn't really require argument to come to the conclusion that it is wrong but there you go.
 
It's legal in our country?

I'll see the Belgian version of PETA in a whole new perspective now... :cringe:


Bestiality is something I can't even comprehend why poeple would engage in...

Come on, has anyone once seen the rear from a cow... who is that icky to put his cane in a cow? :ack:
 
Having Sex = unhealthy, morally repugnant, gross, and in general a violation of the animal's "rights" (yes nebulous I know) that would not be outweighed by any of the benefits discussed in the above things people do to animals.
.

Unless its to encourage illerate people to read books !!! :lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom