I feel that people who are not religious are incapable of being moral and acting moral. Mainly what I have seen. Here are some examples that I have noticed. Many atheists and non-religious people tend to support anything that is unChristian such as abortions, same-gender marrages, and euthenasia. Non religious people and atheist also practace immoral acts such as sex before marrage, using artifical birth control. This is just what I see from my eyes. I know that my words dont weigh heavely in an atheist majority forum, but these are just my opinions.
This is a somewhat fallacious argument. You can hardly claim evidence that atheists are immoral and hence morality stemmed from religion on the grounds that atheists do not obey a specific religion's moral code. This fits equally well with a moral atheist refusing to accept the modifications to a pre existing moral code that a religion has made to suit its own ends, especially those aspects of this modified code which are actively detrimental to human society.
Yes, there probably are atheists that reject the Christian moral code purely to annoy Christians, but similarly there are probably "Christians" who break every rule of the Christian code and then hypocritically preach that it is mortal sin to do so. You can't sweepingly state that all of a group are immoral for the actions of a few.
To take the actions you list above as categorically immoral, but based on the Christian moral code, not human morality, none of the above are that clear cut. As someone who is closer to atheism than religion, I would agree with you that abortion is immoral, however I do not agree that euthanasia, sex before marriage and same gender marriages are always, if ever immoral, and few things annoy me more, and have caused more harm to human society than the Catholic Church's idiotic claims that birth control is immoral.
It is the highly selective, and self serving nature of the Christian, and indeed many other religious codes, which make me strongly think they are not original, but have had religious doctrine snuck into them. Their lack of consistency is one of the most glaring signs of this. Why does Christianity not condemn the wearing of multicoloured clothing with the same vehemance it does birth control? The Bible clearly states that the former is a sin, but I can find no mention of the latter. Why do Christians not preach that it is acceptable to sell your children into slavery? The Bible again clearly states that this is morally acceptable.
The reason is of course that slavery is now recognised as morally unacceptable, but based on an atheist, and not a religious moral code. It would hinder the spread of Christianity to preach things which are now blatantly immoral, so they discard those bits of a supposedly divine moral code which can no longer be hidden within the moral code humanty has built up over the years. Similarly those rules which are blatantly pointless are abandoned in an attempt to make it less obvious that material superfluous to morality has been buried in the code by religion.
For more obvious examples of self serving "religious morality", how about apostasy (the mortal sin of thinking for one's self), or the apparent moral importance of giving money to the church. These have no place in morality.
Atheism not only produced the first moral code, but is a better source for it than any religion, since the code produced is uncorrupted by religious dogma or human greed. It serves for the benefit of humanity as a whole, not merely for the benefit of the upper echelons of a religious organisation.
