dutchfire said:
So, make a poll in a few days to decide if we'll play it out, or start a new game?
I suggest some sort of feeler poll first to try to gauge interest in a new game. If there isn't much interest (from those not actively posting now) then what's the point of a new game?
Also, we've never been able to jump right in a start a new game without first having an extended rules discussion. We either talk and don't accomplish much or we talk a little and then start playing with half baked rules which comes back to haunt us mid-game.
Why don't we start the rules discussion for the nextr game now while we're playing this one a while longer. We could use this DG as an expirimental base if we want. Getting ready for a new DG might rekindle interest in this one.
A couple suggestions for talking about:
Do away with DP pool elections. Has anyone ever ran for DP and not be 'elected'? Have a sign up sheet for DP and give citizens a chance to challenge anyone on the list, sort of like we do with appointments and recalls.
Reduce the number of elections (let the president or tri make more appointments) and base terms on turns not months.
Let's have political parties. Sure we risk javing a Chieftess party or an anti-donsig party but so what? We might end up with parties based on issues: the warmongers party, the peaceniks party, etc.
Let's start with a flexible constitution like in the Civ III DG III and just add a CoL as we need rules. Let's try using the CoL to mandate things in the
game, like the size of our armed forces.
Let's do away with the chats and make this a forum based game.
Let's give the judiciary the power to post binding game play instructions.
Let's redefine and clarify the role of the Censor.
Let's redefine and clarify the constitutional system of decision making.