Leader Elimination Thread

[LoneRebel]

So what you're saying is that this vote is 100% completely useless because there are no criteria. One person May randomly down vote a sponsor because they hate to them for no particular reason while another person may vote for a sponsor because they think they look cool.

Game design and game mechanics are completely out the window and it is full on derp mode. Got it.

Wasn't it obvious from the beginning? Don't see what you're complaining about.

 

[bhavv]

Wasn't it obvious from the beginning? Don't see what you're complaining about.

Don't take this as an offense but I wonder how many times will I have to repeat myself?
I already explained twice that this elimination thread is about your personal preference and/or experiences you made with each leader/sponsor. If this means you downvote a leader because you simply don't like his/her appearance then so be it.

@Craig Lern to read please. If you don't like the criteria then why bother posting?

 

[Mustakrakish]

Don't take this as an offense but I wonder how many times will I have to repeat myself?
I already explained twice that this elimination thread is about your personal preference and/or experiences you made with each leader/sponsor. If this means you downvote a leader because you simply don't like his/her appearance then so be it.

Offense? Please...

But yeah...

Rejinaldo -3, lame ability / +1, looks cool
Kozlov -3, I hate his broken Russian / +1, tech slingshot
Elodie -3, just so overbearingly boring to look at, almost fall asleep every time I see her / +1, because Europe
Daoming -3, not cool to play against / +1, like her body language and expressions
Hutama -3, Polystralia is the stupidest name ever / +1, like the way he speaks
ACR lady (whatever is her name) -3 just don't like her face / +1 fun to play as
Token black guy -3, who? / +1 no, really... who?
Whatheverita Whatevur -3, just meh / +1 lol spiritual supremacy

Yep, that was totally useful, whoever wins, wins because and it's useful because whatever because.

Don't you take offense either, just expressing my opinion that maybe, just MAYBE it should have a theme.

 

[Bezurn]

While it would be nice if people were voting on which leader performed the best, there will typically people who vote just cuz in any of these forum games. So back to voting...

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 23
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 24
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 35
Hutama (Polystralia) - 28
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 13

-3 for Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - Quicker land acquistion is not terribly useful. Leader is always nice and all, but if you are mean to aliens, she is mean to you.

+1 for Hutama (Polystralia) - Two extra trade routes is very powerful from the start in either establishing a sprawling empire or utilizing early stations for a culture, science, or production edge.

 

[Browd]

Moderator Action: Time to remind everyone about the rules for this thread. This is an elimination game thread; if you don't like the game, don't play. If you do play, you must comply with the rules, including rules regarding frequency of voting. Also, you must provide a reason for every vote; you cannot say "I gave my reasons earlier and am bored of typing" -- if you don't give a reason for each vote, you are spamming the thread and may be infracted. Finally, keep it civil. There is too much borderline trolling in recent posts.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[Dellan]

Exactly. Just refrain from posting in this thread if you're not here to vote...
I don't get the hassle anyway.

I updated the main post to reflect Brasilia's elimination.

 

[Lord Tirian]

So... let's continue:

Again, voting for Elodie because I like her snappy quotes and because Franco-Iberia is actually quite fun to play.

And... this time a downvote for Hutama because: "What is ours is yours... for a price!"

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 24 [+1]
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 24
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 35
Hutama (Polystralia) - 25 [-3]
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 13

 

[SamSniped]

I swear I'll actually buy Civ:BE. Eventually.

And @whoever was complaining about the lack of seriousness in this game, look at literally ANY elimination game before this. They shouldn't be serious

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 24
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 24
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 35
Hutama (Polystralia) - 26
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

 

[Black Whole]

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 25 (+1)
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 24
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 36 (+1)
Hutama (Polystralia) - 26
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

It's my turn again One point for Elodie because she still likes me although I declared war on her to grab some land
And one point to Daoming. I like her cold and strictly scientific world view

 

[aguliondew]

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 25
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 26
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 36
Hutama (Polystralia) - 26
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

 

[GenyaArikado]

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 26
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 26
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 36
Hutama (Polystralia) - 23
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

 

[Browd]

Moderator Action: Remember people -- reasons. You have to give reasons for your votes. The last two posters have not provided reasons, so their votes should be disregarded. I don't want to infract people for spam -- no fun for anyone -- so give reasons.

 

[dino_yoshi13]

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 25
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 24 + 1 = 25
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 36
Hutama (Polystralia) - 26 - 3 = 23
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

Kavitha is probably on of the least annoying AI's in BE, so upvoted for that.
As for Hutama, I really can't stand your attitude buddy.

 

[bhavv]

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 25
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 25
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 37 +1
Hutama (Polystralia) = 24 +1
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

I'm giving another +1 to both PAC and Hutama because they have my favorite UAs.

 

[aguliondew]

Moderator Action: Remember people -- reasons. You have to give reasons for your votes. The last two posters have not provided reasons, so their votes should be disregarded. I don't want to infract people for spam -- no fun for anyone -- so give reasons.

Been up voting KP most of the time and down voting the various Civ that give me issues during my games. Did not think I would have to give a reason every time I voted . Used all of my votes yesterday to up vote KP because someone down voted her.

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 25
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 27
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 37
Hutama (Polystralia) - 24
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

I put yesterdays votes back in.

 

[GenyaArikado]

I dont need to post the reasons each time i vote down or up lol. Elodie is rich, the upper class abd old money while Hutama is a brat with an annoying trade line and a pain in the arse to get rid off.

Btw, i know it hasnt been 24 hours but (at least were i live) its a different day and i will be busy later today so....

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 27 (my vote+my past vote)
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 29 (those pasts votes)
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 37
Hutama (Polystralia) - 18 (-3 and my previous -3)
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

 

[Dellan]

Your votes are all over the place...

@GenyaArikado
There need to be 24 Hours between each of your votes and it doesn't matter if a new day began in your time zone. 24 Hours (counting from the moment you posted) need to pass. That means your latest rating (#156) is invalid. The other one is okay since you gave your reasons now.

This is the current table including my vote:

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 26
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 27
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 37
Hutama (Polystralia) - 23 (+2)
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

Hutama: The only leader I currently use when I play.
His AI never backstabbed me so far

 

[GenyaArikado]

I'll just assume you cant read. But anyway i cba to fight

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 27 +1
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 27
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 37
Hutama (Polystralia) - 20 (-3)
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

Hutama: sucker
Elodie:

Moderator Action: Please make your point without making personal attacks on the other posters. That is considering flaming.
In addition, please use regular text as reasons instead of using annoying animated gifs. That is considering trolling.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889

 

[Metecury]

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 28 (+1)
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 27
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 37
Hutama (Polystralia) - 17 (-3)
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10

 

[JokerJace]

I'll go ahead and ignore the last poster fot stating reasons.

-3 for Elodie because she isn't pretty and that's how females should be judged.
+1 for Hutama because his faction has the stronges UA in the current iteration of the game.

Élodie (Franco-Iberia) - 24 (-3)
Kavitha Thakur (Kavithan Protectorate) - 27
Daoming Sochua (Pan-Asian Cooperative) - 37
Hutama (Polystralia) - 21 (+1)
Vadim Kozlov (Slavic Federation) - 10