Some people seem to be labouring under the impression that the guy doing the actor-hiring and the voice recording, is the same guy who programs code.
Other people seem to be labouring under the impression that Firaxis have limited funds.
Odd.
First, I see no reason to believe Firaxis has unlimited funds. No publisher or developer would touch the game if they couldn't make a tidy margin on it. Second, I don't know who thinks that the voice acting resource is just as capable a coder as he is for voicing. However, the money spent on that resource is equally good to purchase a developer. Thus, the resources are completely interchangeable.
There are those of us who still believe that the net aesthetic effect (and lets be honest here, its nothing but aesthetic) isn't as valuable as another coding resource.
There's not only the English language in the world. You won't get by with intellectual laziness. Open up.
Then, question is : why would you be annoyed if someone spoke a language that is NOT English? For milleniums people have coped with people not speaking there language. Why wouldn't Anglophones?Wow I never thought my simple little option would result in such animosity that people would result to insults in a forum of ideas.
It's not intellectual laziness, for games like Civ there really isn't an immersion factor for me so it adds nothing. Like many other people have said in posts across this form, Civ is not a world simulator, it's a game loosely based of history. They frequently make many historical sacrifices in the sake of making the game more fun to play. I don't see anyone complaining about being able to instantly negotiate a contract with another civilization 1000+ KM away in an ancient time when communications took months.
I realize that English is not the only language in the world. If you really wanted to get into that aspect they shouldn't even have subtitles, because the're are subtitles in life, and any communications that come from other civs should be in their own tongue, and all characters should be their own. However, that would just be ridiculous and I see each leader speaking in their own tongue the same way.
Then, question is : why would you be annoyed if someone spoke a language that is NOT English? For milleniums people have coped with people not speaking there language. Why wouldn't Anglophones?
Well, obviously they don't have unlimited funds. But they do have enough funds to include these extraneous, fun features without compromising their ability to make a good game, otherwise they wouldn't have done it.
Have some faith. They're not stupid. They've already given us four excellent Civ games.
Don't turn this argument on its head. It doesn't make sense. I'm the one satisfied with Firaxis's feature. He's the one that is annoyed if he "cannot understand the character's speach". Good thing he can read the dialog box that's sure to be in English underneath the fullscreen leaderhead.This only demonstrates your own ethnocentric bias. For all you know our friend WeaselSlapper may only use English as a Second language. The point he's making is that, in his opinion, listening to world leaders speak in their original languages is annoying. Whether he's Anglophone, Francophone, or L337ophone (LOL! L337ophones PWNAGE!) the other languages are basically noise.
Don't turn this argument on its head. It doesn't make sense. I'm the one satisfied with Firaxis's feature. He's the one that is annoyed if he "cannot understand the character's speach". Good thing he can read the dialog box that's sure to be in English underneath the fullscreen leaderhead.
Then, question is : why would you be annoyed if someone spoke a language that is NOT English?
Not once did I ever say that they had to speak English only. I would to have the option to have the leaders speak English for the English version, but I would also expect them to speak German for the German version. At first each leader speaking their own language would be cool and interesting, but would then become frustrating because I would have to read stupid subtitles, and I hate subtitles. I find myself too busy reading subtitles and I don't get to enjoy the visuals.
Though, seriously, in Civs 1 through 4 there are only "subtitles". Just...shut your ears or something.
Have you seen Mel Gibsons Apocalypto or The Passion of Christ, or any other foreign movie like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon? You didn't enjoy those more than had they been done with English voices?!To be honest I don't read anything any of the other leaders say in Civ IV I just look at what they are asking for/demanding. If they're going to speak I would prefer to understand what they say rather then read it, it eliminates the point of having them speak at all.
I assume that there will be subtitles. So far, there hasn't been any Civ where the leader speaks any language, you just have to read it. Nothing has really changed from a functional standpoint.
This has nothing to do with me not wanting to read, it's about the Devs adding elements that don't enhance gameplay.
Have you seen Mel Gibsons Apocalypto or The Passion of Christ, or any other foreign movie like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon? You didn't enjoy those more than had they been done with English voices?!