Paisley_Trees
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2022
- Messages
- 72
How about Machiavelli for an exploration age Florence? 

That's one I would be delighted to see. But I'd rather see him as Rousseau saw him, as a political satirist.How about Machiavelli for an exploration age Florence?![]()
Oh for sure, but I would presume Alex and Genghis are held in high regard in Greece and Mongolian respectively (this is just assumption on my part, I admit) and I again assume that Mexico doesn’t esteem the Aztecs as vital to their national Identity as much as the anti-colonialists and revolutionaries of the last couple of centuries. I get your meaning though.
Cesare BorgiaHow about Machiavelli for an exploration age Florence?![]()
Timur. Woulda beat Ghengis with an equivalent army.
William the Conqueror.
Alfred the Great.
Clovis.
would never happen, but, Richard Nixon. Unique leader bonus; ability to sabotage another leaders initation of peace talks for 10 turns, ability to initiate combat and pillage tiles on the border without a declaration of war. Unique unit? B-52. Can bomb 3 improved tiles in one turn. I'd like the dark comedy of it.
No to Marx. Every death under Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Xi Jinping, and other commie dictators is ultimately attributable to Marx himself.- Karl Marx
Absolutely not. His very face is the equivalent of a swastika - a hate symbol utterly outside the Overton Window and unacceptable in polite society.Che Guevara
Your statements are no less dictatorial than those of Marx, whom you dislike... If you are a hardened liberal, then you must respect the freedom of choice of those who freely choose Marx or Stalin as their favorites.No to Marx. Every death under Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Xi Jinping, and other commie dictators is ultimately attributable to Marx himself.
Absolutely not. His very face is the equivalent of a swastika - a hate symbol utterly outside the Overton Window and unacceptable in polite society.
He's already too fashionable among misguided youths who grow up do be domestic terrorists with Antifa.
That's like saying every death in the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the Thirty Years War is ultimately attributable to JesusNo to Marx. Every death under Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Xi Jinping, and other commie dictators is ultimately attributable to Marx himself.
Richelieu
Torquemada
Elisabeth Bathory
Herod
Robespierre
Caligula
as-Saffah (literally translates to "the blood-shedder")
Selim I
Muhammad ibn Tughluq
Attila
Ching Shih
Lucrezia Borgia
Shaghab (Abbasid queen who conspired from the harem)
Shawar (cunning opportunist notable for changing sides during the Crusades)
If we still had workers in Civ7, I just know he'd have some zingers for his linesPersonally, I like the inclusion of Marx as a leader, and I think he could bring something new and interesting to the table.
Dictatorship of the Proletariat: Your Workers are now Infantry units, with the same stats as the weakest Infantry unit you can build. Workers gain extra combat strength from adjacent workers.If we still had workers in Civ7, I just know he'd have some zingers for his lines
Moses, actually. He‘s responsible for all religious-related killing (aside from rituals) as Jan Assmann argumented. Bit of a bold claim though, especially if simplified in this way (still a great book nonetheless).That's like saying every death in the Crusades, the Inquisition, and the Thirty Years War is ultimately attributable to Jesus