Leaders U Hate

The Worst Leaders in Existence

  • Charlemagne of HRE

    Votes: 20 17.4%
  • Genghis Khan of Mongols

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Kublai Khan of Mongols

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Montezuma of the Aztecs

    Votes: 22 19.1%
  • Tokugawa of the Japanese

    Votes: 36 31.3%
  • Boudica of the Celts

    Votes: 6 5.2%
  • Other

    Votes: 29 25.2%

  • Total voters
    115
I fear Boudi is the worst to play for me, a shame cos i like her background and Celtic mythology.
She is set up to be a warmonger, but that's no good with the slowest of all possible starts and no UU or UB to make up for it -.-
 
Japan for me. You get terrible traits when you play as Toku, and playing against him can cause games to stagnate due to his 'no open borders' issues. Did he spend a little bit too much time with Father Sasuke as a kid or something? Why you not give open borders?
 
Historically it makes a lot of sense. Tokugawa was the dude that closed Japan off from foreign influence for 200+ years.

The civ developers know their history.
 
Shaka is imba good! His UU = guaranteed early choke/kill, unstoppable pillager & worker stealer, and has access to shock/cover with only a (cheap) Ikhanda, which is an awesome UB. Expansive also very nice in the early game for whipping out granaries and workers.
 
Hmm... I may have to re-evaluate Creative, then. I am at the moment quite happy with Cyrus because of the 4 times GG points he gives with Imperialistic and the Great Wall. Charismatic just means I get my melee and mounted units to ultra elite status faster.
Great wall only multiplies GG points within your own borders, where warfare really shouldn't be going on.
AGG is useless for HAs.

No it's not. 1 pop whip rax allows you to get started building stables while you research archery that much sooner.
 
Historically it makes a lot of sense. Tokugawa was the dude that closed Japan off from foreign influence for 200+ years.

Actually, Tokugawa's successors closed Japan. Compared to those before and after him Tokugawa was relatively tolerant of foreign interaction for a good deal of his reign.
 
Unless you're just using the enemy as a tool to farm experience and GGs =)

Precisely ;)

Come to papa, my little pretty stack of bad guys... :hammer::hammer::hammer:




Speaking of Alex vs Peri, I am playing a game now where I have a Japanese Alex and a Persian Peri. Alex is curbstomping Peri in the Classical Age with swords, axes and HA, from across half a continent...! It is ugly and brutal.
 
I voted Toku because he has the hardest start in the game. His starting techs on certain maps are terrible which makes it hard in the beginning especially since the other traits do not help either at building or growing. However late game Toku is amazing. Samurai are amazing and I count the rifles also as an unique unit. But still every time I play Toku I have a hard start. However Toku on Civ Rev on the PS3 I count Toku as on of the strongest leaders :)
 
Tokugawa. No econ traits... and he's the most idiotic AI in all of existence. :/
 
Voted for Joao, don't hate playing as him but as AI he expands very fast ,is often friends with everybody and ends up with someone like Monty as his vassal (at least in my games).
 
Iam really no fan of prot/agg, but they fit together a bit cos some units get both.
Toku also has good starting techs, you can get Pottery right away.
His UB comes late but has a benefit that is not wasted in that time, and the Samurai is not bad.
Not a bottom tier leader imo.
 
I agree with mylene - Toku isn't so bad since with a FP start, you can start planting cottages very early on. Plus, protective is a lot more useful on deity for reducing the chance of an early game loss to a dow. That being said, I don't like HRE. His starting techs are complete crap (even Toku has better techs). Unfortunately he's actually quite decent in the hands of the AI, although he's no Zara.
 
You don't get it. When you take over a city, that city becomes YOUR territory. When his counterattack comes...

Nope I don't get it. I'd rather wage offensive wars thank you very much. I try to reconnoiter the AI stack before DOW and destroy it so the counterattack consists of turtling.
 
Nope I don't get it. I'd rather wage offensive wars thank you very much. I try to reconnoiter the AI stack before DOW and destroy it so the counterattack consists of turtling.

I personally agree with you, but I could see the benefit of perma-warring with one AI who you never intend to attack. Worker steal him or something in the early game, and then never grant peace. You won't get much war weariness if you never attack his cities, and he'll make idiotic attacks that feed you experience.
 
Top Bottom