Why are people comparing Mali to Venice? Is it because Mali will be slow early game getting out settlers, then will have extra trade routes and gold mid to late game?
Hmm.
I really want to like these guys, but they seem ... ugh. Not great.
Maori seem to have a really distinctive play style. But Mali in comparison look like you just play them basically like any other Vanilla Civ. The only difference is (1) like Indonesia, you’ll get an early Pantheon, (2) ancient and classical era will be slower - you’ll still build settlers, Builders and units, you’ll just be slower, and (3) when you get to the mid game, you’ll have more gold and faith than others (on average).
Mali have a production malus, but unlike say Maori and Kongo maluses, their malus doesn’t stop them doing anything in particular - they’re just “not as good” at earning or using hammers.
Likewise, there’s nothing unique about how the earn gold: build Commercial Hubs, get Trade Routes. Their CH district doesn’t even really have any unique placement or adjacency rules - you just slot it by a river and your city centre like everyone else. The only difference is maybe you put a Holy Site next to it to make a triangle. Big whoops.
If these guys had harder maluses - eg no IZs or Encampments - or their bonuses required more unique strategies - eg you get Trade Routes from shrines not CHs, or you CH produce gold and faith, or CHs increase religious pressure - I’d be more excited. At the moment, the only reason I see myself playing them is because I want to try out a harder slower start at higher difficulties.
Sorry. I really want to get on board with these guys, but I’m just not seeing it.