Master Map Change Thread

What would you propose the city placement would be in these?
 
I like to found more cities than most people, but I personally would go with:

Washington, New York, Quebec, Toronto, Atlanta (1 north of marble), Houston, Albuquerque, Chicago, St. Louis, Denver (on hill), Winnipeg (1 south of the lake), Calgary (1 south of the Canadian oil), maybe Phoenix/Boise/Vegas, L.A., San Francisco, and Vancouver.

But that's just me. I don't like the idea of covering the U.S. and Canada with a few supercities, but I know some people do.
 
Keep your mind out of settling Canada as America. What would the placement be for being within US borders?
 
No New Orleans? I'd rather have a city in New Orleans than one in the Kentucky area.
 
Then that's a problem with the game. If Turkey was able to take over Russia easy and without handicaps or limitations, it's the game's fault not the historical Turkish people's fault for not taking the opportunity.
 
Then that's a problem with the game. If Turkey was able to take over Russia easy and without handicaps or limitations, it's the game's fault not the historical Turkish people's fault for not taking the opportunity.

I don't find that this comparison holds water.
Canada does not have a civ to occupy it, other than the English and the French,
and they don't build their cities all the way across Canada, usually settling only around Quebec.
As a result, it's just empty and ripe for the taking.
Russia on the other hand is occupied by a civ; Russia.
 
Why don't the British settle farther westward?
 
Two wine resources in California are too many. Italy, France and Spain should be the only countries able to export wine.
 
Two wine resources in California are too many. Italy, France and Spain should be the only countries able to export wine.

The US produces comparable amounts of wine to Spain and Italy, and Californian wines are the most internationally competitive with French.

On a related note, Argentina should probably get a Wine resource at the same time California does.
 
USA exports 3,6% of worlds wine just ahead of Germany with 3.5%, so one wine is definetly enough for California. Australia has one wine at almost 10%.

Also there is one wine on the border of Chile and Argentina.
 
The US produces comparable amounts of wine to Spain and Italy, and Californian wines are the most internationally competitive with French.

On a related note, Argentina should probably get a Wine resource at the same time California does.

It's not only a matter of quantity of wine produced (btw in this chart France, Italy and Spain would occupy first three positions), but a matter of amounts of wine exported, in terms of milions of hectoliters or market shares. American wine is mainly absorbed by domestic market, instead of French, Italian or Spanish wine, which share more than a half of global wine exports.
 
The Wine in the U.S. should be 1N of the San Francisco tile,
directly corresponding to Napa Valley, California's premiere wine-making region.
 
Yeah, York Factory often makes its appearance in my games (I slightly buffed up the English AI's playstyle, though). It also sometimes gets conquered by the Americans (I made their leaders moderately aggressive, rather then current wimps. It's amusing how Firaxis made Lincoln and Roosevelt to be total unit underbuild wimps and Washington to be sorta wimpy still).
 
Pffft... maannn... that's on my Hanukkah list, the British able to settle Vancouver at a reasonable time.
 
A wine in Argentina sounds good. Moving the wine in california also sounds good.
So far I support widening California and the Snazzy Oregonia, but I still have to analyze the different in gameplay with Giant's big US overhaul since it's so drastic.
 
Back
Top Bottom