amadeus
Bishop of Bio-Dome
McKinney was in Libya? 
I knew someone who voted for her in 2008. He was a nut, too.

I knew someone who voted for her in 2008. He was a nut, too.
So, if you accept that bombing Libya or Kosovo under cover of "democracy" is acceptable, then bombing Iraq was also acceptable to start with and the war was just "mismanaged" afterward. That's the present excuse for the ongoing occupation there.
Is it obvious? Widespread support for a revolution means hundreds of thousands of people throwing away their lives for it. We haven't seen that in Libya. In fact all we've seen were rebels running back and fro in the desert and shooting to the air.
Perhaps the libyans just got lucky: none of the sides was strong enough to forcefully conscript them en masse into government or rebel armies, as it happened in the French Revolution, and the Russian Revolution, and so many other real revolutions with "widespread support".
The French revolution was not a bad thing: sure, some noblemen got beheaded, boohoo. Terrible. Yes, there was a short period of wasteful terror, but that dissipated. The end result, Napoleon's empire (because it failed, but spread the anti-monarchist ideals further) and the Republics were essentially positive forces.
Napoleon's empire a good thing? For the generations to come, I guess that it's debatable, but I dare say that your average european peasant of 1800 would rather not have had armies marching and pillaging across Europe, not to mention the invention of the levée en masse.
Yes it was. There were several reasons given at the very start, and bringing Democracy to Iraq was one of them.No, Iraq war was unacceptable because "democracy spreading" was never the initial stated intention to begin with.
And, frankly, I don't care. Whatever the stated intention is, the actual result we're currently getting is good: Qadaffi is getting the stuffing beat out of him.
Is he? And here I was, thinking that the bombs were landing all over Libya and not exclusively on top of Qadaffi himself. He must be one hell of a though guy, to have been hit personally by so many tons of bombs and still be around...![]()
Plus there's the guns being shipped so that the libyans can continue their merry civil war, which, I'm sure, is only doing them good!
An interesting question for the history forum someday. I think you could make the case that the levée en masse increased political rights in the long run.