Bast said:I have 1.3 Ghz/256 MB Ram and an old video card.. something like RAGE 128 PRO. Do you think this'll be enough?
Sark6354201 said:NOT true, you should not need to spend a 1000$ on a machine to play Civ4. Especially if you are not buying a monitor.
For 7 or 800, you can get a nice machine that will for sure be able to handle Civ4.
Things to look for when buying a machine:
Athlon or Pentium for gaming, don't go crazy over the clock speed or rating either. Moderate jumps in clock speed (like a 3.2 P4 to a 3.4 P4) can cost a lot of money without giving comparable benefit.
At LEAST 512 RAM
An ATi or Geforce video card that is not a budget card (mx 4000, radeon 9200) Try to avoid the FX series of the Geforce if you can. But at the very least just make sure it has a video card.
Past that, adequate cooling (case fans) and a case that has good ventilation (side vents) if you can find one.
Try to get a machine with a PCI-Express slot, as then you can upgrade to future video cards, since AGP is now defunct.
I would say those are the main things... hope that helps![]()
RKR said:Here is a system I just put together based on recomendations from ArsTechnica
http://secure.newegg.com/NewVersion...=1708943&WishListTitle=ARSTECHNICA+BUDGET+BOX
$689 plus shipping
AMD64 3000+
2gb ram ddr 3200
160 gb hd
GeForce 6600
Antec Case
MSI Mobo
maples45 said:Does anyone know if this video card/chip will support the transform and lighting?
VIA/S3G KM400/KN400
I have a sinking feeling it wont. I read elsewhere it was a chip, not a card. Althogh it passed all the dxdiag.exe test. Sorry, I am a total noob.
jameson said:I'm quite certain it will.
Somebody also posted a link to a site which checks your hardware against the sys requirements for a series of games; it's at http://www.srtest.com/. Check there if you want to be sure.
Hi. Thanks for the suggestions.Sark6354201 said:Unfortunately, no...
That rage 128 is a terrible video card compared to other modern video cards. You have very little RAM, and your processor is too slow.
The only way you can 'do without' a video card is by using integrated graphics on your motherboard if it has it. Integrated graphics are almost always slow and nothing more than a cheap solution so that a video card does not have to be added in.
You'll have PCI slots and be able to find a PCI video card that will be better than that Rage 128 by leaps and bounds. You can also upgrade your RAM to 512 most likely. If you upgrade to a PCI card (fx 5200 comes to mind) or can find a AGP card that will work with the AGP slot you have (IF you have one) and you upgrade your RAM, Civ4 should be PLAYABLE.
But really, it's not worth it... unless you cannot absolutely afford a new system and really want to play the game, don't waste money upgrading the machine. Forgot to add in, if you check the motherboard manual for the socket type of the board, you might be able to find a used processor of that socket type that would be faster than the 1.3ghz CPU you have in there now.
varwnos said:Is 512 mb ram a bit optimistic? I have a p4 3gz, with a geforce5700 (i think) but only 512 ram, and it still laged a bit with 31 civs on a huge map in civ3. Granted there were no lags of over half a minute, but there were still lags, and civ4 will be in full 3d...
1 GHz CPU, 256MB RAM, and a 32MB video card with hardware transform and lighting capabilities. The recommended Specifications are: 512MB of ram, Pentium4 processor, and a recent graphics card (like the Radeon 9800).
dannyevilcat said:FYI, he's bragging.
jameson said:Heh, now that I look at it I see why I wouldn't even begin looking at the 7800GTX as an upgrade . Price range and all...
I work tech support for an ISP (pretty basic stuff) and you wouldn't believe how frequently people say they bought a new system when they couldn't get online with the previous one. And in those cases , the problem usually has something to do with firewall settings or their computer name (which is used for DHCP) :shakehead.