bruv, autolycus, i sorta wish u hadnt sed dat stuff abaht ur personal goal. coz if it wernt 4 dat, classical_hero wud b so gilty-lookin rite now. heres y (gonna rite it so i dun hav 2 do dis voice):
He made a bold claim pretty early:
I am an angel and that has given me special powers, even though I am a minor angel. I do suggest you vote the same way as I do.
For starters, he never considered the possibility that he might be killed by the Agents. No pleading for protection in the thread, or any of that. Now that makes sense, if he knew from the start that the nominations decided the Agent kills, but did he? Did you? I only learned it yesterday, and then only because somebody told me.
Of course, if he were an Agent, it's highly likely that he knew how the kills worked before any of the rest of us did, and he knew that he was under no threat. No-one's going to nominate someone who claims to know whether a person is innocent or guilty.
The claim also puts him into a good position to decide who gets killed. And if we look at his voting record:
classical_hero
Night 1: Catharsis
Night 2: Domination3000
Night 3: choxorn
Night 4: civplayah
he has been on every bandwagon so far. I haven't been in contact with him, but for those who have: how instrumental
was classical in deciding these bandwagons? Because I'm a princess, which is a good bet for 'low-strength innocent' (luckily, I'm more than I appear) and Dom3K was a merchant - we're not likely to be stronger than, say, a farmer or a sculptor. (Don't know much about falconers or coinsmiths. Falcons and coins aren't particularly heavy things.)
There are a lot of likely low-strength innocents on that list. And every innocent killed with a strength lower than that of the killer gains that killer +1 strength. Early prophet-claim makes sense for an Agent, I think.