Patine
Deity
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2011
- Messages
- 11,524
Forgive us, tech, we know not what we do.You guys are making me cross.
Forgive us, tech, we know not what we do.You guys are making me cross.
I think it's magnificent.
I also think it's the best solution. I'll slow down the battleships I, and I'll have to figure out how to make them useful in attack on land but useless at sea... What if I nullify the ability of the rest of the ships to attack on land by making them have submarine advances? It will certainly give them an advantage and I can also increase their advances, reducing them in winter.
Great idea. What if we replace ironclad I with wooden bombardment brig and then event-release the ironclad to the Alliance?I think you're on the right track here. If you do make all other warships unable to bombard the shore, you need an early wooden bombardment brig or somesuch with worse defensive stats to the ironclad. Maybe replace the ironclad ii in the ango french fleet with this.
I had done a conversion and, at least, units graphics, update a year or so ago. I just uploaded it to a post, and not in the SL, so you probably missed it.Hi all,
Nick Dowling's "The Battle of Australia" scenario has been updated to run with ToT and ToTPP. It can be downloaded from the CivFanatics download section located here.
The city, icons, people, terrain and units graphics have been updated.
I would like to extend a very special note of gratitude to Tanelorn for designing the graphics for the Australian air (CAC & Woomera) and AC Sentinel tank units!
I’d never played the scenario beforehand and found it to be overall quite well made and certainly challenging.
I had done a conversion and, at least, units graphics, update a year or so ago. I just uploaded it to a post, and not in the SL, so you probably missed it.
No harm done. As I’ve often told Tech, when designers work on similar projects, it just gives the community members more options to choose from!Since I too, can't remember which post it was, I'll just re-upload it.
It's likely more of a rudimentary conversion than yours, admittedly.
Oh, and while we're on the topic, I'm pretty sure these two conversion from similarly long ago were also uploaded only by posting and never made it to the SL,No harm done. As I’ve often told Tech, when designers work on similar projects, it just gives the community members more options to choose from!
Other thing to mention is if you don't put scenarios in the downloads area and you only upload them as attachments to forum posts in this thread then it's important that you spell out the name of the scenario in the text of that forum post so that people doing text searches can find it as I don't believe the forum text search looks at attachment file names, it only looks at text in posts. Meaning your work will not be findable again once the above post gets buried soon. So you might wanna edit your post and stick the scenario names in mate. I notice @gapetit doesn't always put scenario names in his posts either, however he usually creates a download section page so his stuff can be found in searches, although maybe not always so he might wanna check his posts too. No point putting all that work in guys if no one can find your stuff in searches heh.Oh, and while we're on the topic, I'm pretty sure these two conversion from similarly long ago were also uploaded only by posting and never made it to the SL,
Hi Tootall,Hi all,
Nick Dowling's "The Battle of Australia" scenario has been updated to run with ToT and ToTPP. It can be downloaded from the CivFanatics download section located here.
The city, icons, people, terrain and units graphics have been updated.
I would like to extend a very special note of gratitude to Tanelorn for designing the graphics for the Australian air (CAC & Woomera) and AC Sentinel tank units!
I’d never played the scenario beforehand and found it to be overall quite well made and certainly challenging.
Ah yes I forgot about that.. wow.. so that's 3 people who've remade Battle of Australia now.. we're spoilt for choice!
Three versions of the same scenario...now that's what I call choice!Ah yes I forgot about that.. wow.. so that's 3 people who've remade Battle of Australia now.. we're spoilt for choice!
Yes, thank you for pointing this out. As I indicated, even when you do a search it's not always evident you will find a match hence the reason I recommended that scenarios should preferrably be uploaded in the download section.Other thing to mention is if you don't put scenarios in the downloads area and you only upload them as attachments to forum posts in this thread then it's important that you spell out the name of the scenario in the text of that forum post so that people doing text searches can find it as I don't believe the forum text search looks at attachment file names, it only looks at text in posts...
Hi, @gapetit, this is odd because when I did a search for 'battle of australia' and 'gapetit' in this thead, prior to working on the conversion, it only came back with your post #359, where you only indicated you might be working on the scenario in the future but found no other reference to it afterwards.Hi Tootall,
Blake00 had uploaded this scenario converted to ToT by me in the following post:
It's well described, but not the following ones I included. I'll follow Blake00's instructions and include the names of scenarios and authors, because although the original idea was that they would be temporary before being downloaded, its can be forgotten and lost in time.
In this case, with yours already added, it seems like a job already done, but I think you can at least take advantage of the icons and improvements I made to include them.
Best regards
I'd love for you to improve, whether these or more projects you are encouraged to. I actually also have another scenario that I think you might like...Three versions of the same scenario...now that's what I call choice!
Obviously, as a general rule, you don't want to work on a scenario that's already been converted to avoid unnecessary duplication, though sometimes a simple graphical update might be welcome on older conversions. For my part, I still enjoyed the experience, so no harm done.
Yes, thank you for pointing this out. As I indicated, even when you do a search it's not always evident you will find a match hence the reason I recommended that scenarios should preferrably be uploaded in the download section.
Hi, @gapetit, this is odd because when I did a search for 'battle of australia' and 'gapetit' in this thead, prior to working on the conversion, it only came back with your post #359, where you only indicated you might be working on the scenario in the future but found no other reference to it afterwards.
Perhaps, I should have reached out to you beforehand to be sure, but as I indicated in a prior post, I don't typically like to make pre-announcements because not all my projects necessarily get released.
So just to be sure, this time around, I've been looking into working on the following two MGE scenarios and found no apparent prior conversion projects:
Can you confirm if you have worked on them or not?