I find it hilarious that I, the inveterate classicist, am on
this side of a discussion.
For every citizen. Get the facts straight please.
Citizens' voting rights were not equal due to the wonderful expedient of the tribal system, and the space for voting - the
Campus Martius - was too small to allow for all citizens to vote and thus disenfranchised many of the potential voters. My facts are straight, sir.
Roller123 said:
Like the current one lasted longer. Remind me again when did black people got their right to vote in USA. And if they did what did a certain Martin Luther King fought for. That was what, 50 years ago? Few centuries...
When did I say the United States was far superior?
Roller123 said:
And it is in no way helping the claim that MA people continued to race the tech tree.
You brought Pythagoras up, not me. If you want to talk about going up the tech tree, as you put it, then please talk about my points on metallurgical, chemical, mathematical, philosophical (since that's in the tech tree too

), and agricultural technology.
Roller123 said:
Again, calculating total deaths, w/o regard to the total population is nonsensical. The world was significantly less populated than today. The biggest "thing" was the Spanish Flu in 1918-19 killing like 30mln worldwide(note worldwide, not Europe) I am gonna include all the deaths from WW1 and WW2, lets assume they all died from diseases right.., thats like 20mln and 50mln. Together 100mln, and thats very far fetched. now 100/6000 is 1% of total population. The plague took 50%. Sorry i dont see anything of even a near proximity to "just as bad" as the plague did during Middle Ages and claming otherwise is absurd.
You're ignoring all of the other wonderful epidemics we've had during the past century, for one thing. For another, you keep assigning me a strawman, and I'd like you to stop. I never said that the diseases of the twentieth century were
worse or equal to the effect of those in the fourteenth, merely that they must have caused a
pretty stagnant time in history (going by your assertion as to disease causing stagnation) and that the twentieth century's disease deaths number was
pretty bad. I never said "just as bad".
And we can argue about whether that meant anything for a very long time, but I would like to take this opportunity to discuss the economic consequences of the plague, as it were. The Black Death didn't stop economic and technological development, but in fact
stimulated it. In the words of Herlihy, "men were dying, but coins were not". Deaths from disease, in tightening the labor pool, made wages skyrocket across Europe, and with it went the standard of living of the great mass of people, something that hadn't really improved much for the preceding centuries. (And
certainly not during Antiquity.) The concentration of wealth in fewer hands and labor shortages helped stimulate even further technological growth. Lots of people may have died, but those who survived fueled an impressive run of economic and technological development. So referring to the Black Death as evidence of a backwardness in medieval Europe is silly, because its consequences weren't actually bad.
Roller123 said:
Talking to people does not kill. Talking to unwashed people can. True even today. Talking is not whats stopping the bird flu right now. Claiming that contacting people is dangerous is only true, if the contacted people are dangerously ill in the first place. Which was less of a case during the Antiquity.
Not really. The Germans of the thirteenth century, for example, were much cleaner than the classical Greeks and Romans on average.
Roller123 said:
Aside from the fact that the above is clearly wrong since religion and science have different views on same subjects,
You're misrepresenting the subject, claiming that religion and science can't coexist (a rather lulsome proposition when the Church funded so much scientific research during the early modern period). Religion, furthermore, is not the opposite of atheism. I direct you to some schools of Buddhist thinking, for example.
Roller123 said:
I said science->critical thinking->atheism. Not science->atheism.
I take issue with your assertion that critical thinking always leads to atheism.
Roller123 said:
Incorrect again. Numerical nomenclature is not language dependent. It depends on a system used, and the country. (and changes quite often) The language doesnt matter. Whats a "gram" in English, a "mile"?
Not the same thing. Billion is not a unit of measurement, it's an order of magnitude. There is no such thing as the word
Milliard in modern English; it is a German word.