So basically what you guys who sympathize with this nut are saying is that Firaxis should cater to the ethnic and linguistic prejudices of the stereotypical Iranian? More specifically, this ONE guy? And ignore all historical plausibility by fixing Darius' language to be Farsi?
From everything that I've heard, Farsi as we know it wasn't even spoken at the time Darius reigned.
I understand the regional sensibilities but I'm not quite sure how much of a responsibility Firaxis (or any other company) has in transferring those into a GAME.
And, he would be wrong. Look up old persian. The oldest known inscription was written in old persian, not aramaic.
I made a hypothetical case for an American equivalent to the issue.
It would be nice gameplay-wise, and in the Civ spirit of connecting with history, for Darius to interact with modern Iranian players in Farsi.
No, the point is Darius would definitely NOT be speaking Arabic - all the other civ leaders speak the dominant national language of their time. It is all about historicity not catering to minorities. It would be like having Montezuma speaking in Spanish.
Please check your racial paranoia in at the door.
Rat
On Darius: Aramaic was the lingua Franca of the Achmaemenid empire. Seriously just look it up.
On Thermopylae: There were 1,500 Thebians and 300 Spartans at Thermopylae..
From what i have seen, the problem is that many have insisted that Darius in the game spoke Aramaic, but his first greeting spoken is "Salaam Alaykum", which is most definitely Arabic. I cant judge the rest of the speech, but I think this is where the bone is for those who are frothing at the mouths.
Darius can launch nuclear weapons in 2045, but he can't speak Farsi?
Well I say, that if Darius were alive in 2045 he would be speaking Farsi.
Can someone then confirm whether or not his other quotes (if any) are arabic or aramaic? It sounded like Salaam Aleykum to me; but i'm not familliar with those languages despite being a cunning linguist.
Rat
Another person that watches too much movies and interprets them as fact. There were literally thousands of soldiers at he battle, not just 300.
If it's supposed to be Arabic, he's mis-pronouncing the phrase.
When the battle started they hadover 8kherp derp
There were 300 spartans and 800 slaves..not 2-3k troops, and those 1100 people did the majority of the fighting, against a vastly superior force. By any imagination other than yours, the Persian army got embarrassed at Thermopylae.
Also, there is only one instance of a full strength spartan army ever being defeated in battle, and it wasn't by Xerxes. And yes, he did face a full spartan army in Greece, along with other Greek forces. No, he didn't win.