MrGameTheory's breakdown of the Civ5 PDF manual.. :)

MrGameTheory

Chieftain
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Messages
53
Since your friend and hero is banned from posting strategies based on unconfirmed data, on this message board, I got a little bored so I decided to read the entire Civ 5 PDF manual and break down most of the information of serious value. Since I am only allowed to comment on what is confirmed I had to revise most of what I wanted to say, but this should still be a treasure. In some areas I simply copied and pasted very important parts of the Civ Manual that people should keep in mind for now :cool:

Enjoy :D


1) Most units will be forced to defend in flat land and there is a -33% strength modifier while defending in most land. There is also a +33% bonus modifier social policy (Oligarchy) that players can easily get, early on, and this social policy gives an attack bonus within cultural borders. Units receive a “flanking” attack bonus of +15% for each unit adjacent to the target unit. A scout loophole can be manipulated by surrounding an enemy unit with cheap scouts and then attacking the unit with ranged units. This turns basic 25 hammer scouts into deadly damage modifiers. In regards to defense, an instant 25% fortification bonus is given to units that fortify for a single turn. This enables a strategic loophole allowing defenders to create defensive walls of units. Fortify for 2 turns and you get a 50% defensive bonus lol. Defensive Bonus of the Fort is also 50%. Cities defend themselves at full combat strength so it will become very difficult for weakened units to take a city with a large population, thus supporting defensive strategies. Great general bonuses like citadel / 25% bonus by standing next to units. To sum it up… There are insanely huge bonuses for defenders in this game. This means that if you create a wall of archers/scouts/chariot archers while defending you can get 100%-300% attack bonus on all attacking units.

2) City Growth in Civ V is slow because the max food that a tile can have is 3-4 food. All food resources for example only give a bonus +1 food when improved.

3) In a City: A unit heals 3 HPs per turn.
In Friendly Territory: 2 HPs per turn.
In Neutral or Enemy Territory: 1 HP per turn.
Naval units cannot heal unless in Friendly territory, where they heal 2 HPs per turn.

4) A damaged unit is less effective when attacking than a fully-healed unit. The more damaged the unit, the less its attack – melee or ranged – will damage an opponent. The actual formula is more complex than this, but as a general rule a unit’s damage output is reduced by half the percentage of HPs that it has lost. In other words, a unit that has lost 5 HPs (50%) has the amount of damage it does reduced by 25%, and the damage a unit that has lost 9HPs (90%) inflicts, is reduced by 45%.

5) A unit gains XPs for surviving a round of combat.
An Attacking Ranged Unit: 2 XPs
Being Attacked by a Ranged Unit: 2 XPs
(Barracks and Armories each provide 15 XPs.)
This means that a normal ancient/medieval unit will have to survive a lot of archer ranged attacks to get the first promotion for an insta heal, but with modifiers most units will never research the insta heal promotion before dying. Based on practical figures from a worst case scenario of archer versus Rifleman - (6 v 25) After the modifiers are factored in the battle ends up becoming - (15 v 18) (((on average))) for the first attacking archer... If the attacking archer can lower the health of the Rifleman to 7-8hp then the next round with the next archer it will be roughly (15 v 13). It will take on Average 3 Archers to kill each rifleman. And this is assuming there are no promotions on either the archers or rifleman.

6) If a city is working on an archer and has 4 turns left and you purchase an archer, you’ll get the purchased archer immediately, and the one that’s under construction 4 turns later – unless of course you change production after purchasing the first archer.

7) You cannot destroy another civ’s capital city.

8 ) A city’s National Wonders are destroyed when the city is captured. The city’s culture and military buildings (temples, barracks, etc.) are always destroyed when the city is taken. All other buildings have a 66% chance of being captured intact.

9) If a city goes into “We Love the King Day” (see “Resources” on page 36) its surplus food input increases by 25%. (If no surplus, no benefit.)

10) If your civilization is unhappy, then the city will produce less food. The city will produce enough food to feed its citizens, but the amount of excess food it produces is decreased by 67% ----- Unhappiness is not as serious as first thought since it does not affect all food, just the surplus above what your citizens need. In a worst case scenario cities will stop growing, but you can still ward off populations from shrinking which is all that would matter for some strategies.

11) Each turn you get a base number of beakers equal to the combined population of all of your cities. The larger your cities, the more beakers you generate. ROFL. If you build an insanely huge army and run cash flow negative…. Don’t worry, it just comes out of your beakers so you can essentially just turn on the war machine and pay for your military with beakers rofl. This game is so dumbed down its scary.

12) It takes a very long time for workers to build improvements in this game so it forces certain social policies to be the first choice in order to get out more workers.
It takes a worker 3 turns to construct a road in any tile
Farm Improvement - 6 Turns
Mine Improvement - 6 Turns
Pasture - 7 Turns
Trading Post - 8 Turns
Remove Forest: 3 Turns
Remove Jungle: 6 Turns
Drain Marsh: 5 Turns
A worker may repair a pillaged road or improvement. It takes a worker 3 turns to repair any road or improvement.
They are slowing down all games, and in the process making it more difficult to get out units…. The problem with this is that players who lose early units will receive huge disadvantages. Sure it will be impossible to take cities, making each game, by default, much longer, but the loss of a combat unit early in the game can equal the pillaging of all improvements and workers.

13) New social policy build order based on what I have read:
Oligarchy / Citizenship / Representation / Warrior Code / Military Tradition / Discipline / Military Caste / Professional Army / Mandate of Heaven / Free Religion / Trade Unions / Mercantilism.

14) Great Artists, Engineers, Merchants and Scientists are created in cities by specialists and Wonders which generate “Great People” (GP) points. A city may generate no Great People points, or it may generate a single kind of GP points or it may generate multiple kinds of GP points. Each city’s GP points are kept track of separately. (For example, Kyoto might generate 1 Artist and 2 Engineer GP points each turn. After 3 turns it would have 3 Artist points and 6 Engineer GP points. The two types of points are not pooled.) When a city has enough of a specific type of GP points, the points are expended to generate a Great Person of that type. Once a Great Person is generated, the amount required for the next Great Person increases in all of that player’s cities. For instance, let’s say that a player needs to acquire 10 GP points to get a Great Person. From the previous example, in five turns Kyoto would have enough Engineer GP points to create a Great Engineer. After the Great Engineer was created, Kyoto would have 0 Great Engineer points and 5 Great Artist points left, and the amount required for the next Great Person would increase to say 15 points. Eight turns later Kyoto would have 13 Great Artist points and 16 Great Engineer points, and it would generate another Great Engineer. Note that a Garden building increases the rate at which you generate Great People.

15) Happiness Bucket: If your civilization is generating more happiness than is required to keep your population content, the excess happiness is collected in a “happiness bucket.” When that bucket acquires enough happiness, a Golden Age is triggered. (If your civilization is unhappy, happiness is drained from the bucket.) A happiness bucket-based Golden Age is 10 turns. A Great Person-based Golden Age is
shorter. Great Person-based Golden Ages decrease in length each time you expend a Great Person to create one, however, they never fall below 3 turns each.

16) If you are the last player in possession of your own original capital you win. So if you capture all other civs’ capitals and hang onto your own, you’ve achieved victory. However, this can be tricky. Suppose you’re in a five-player game and you capture three of your opponents’ original capitals, but the fifth player sneaks in and captures your capital while you’re not paying attention – then he would win immediately. In other words, it doesn’t matter who captures what: it’s the last player holding onto his original capital who gets the victory. LoL

17) Important figures:

Archer - Strength: 4 - Ranged: 6 - Range: 2 - Movement: 2 - Cost: 70
Settler - Movement: 2 - Cost: 89
Worker - Movement: 2 - Cost: 70
Scout -Strength: 4 - Movement: 2 -Cost: 25
Chariot Archer – Strength: 3 - Ranged: 6 - Range: 2 - Movement: 4 - Cost: 60
Chariot archers are ridiculously imbalanced. Having horse is very powerful and players without horse will have a huge strategic disadvantage lol. Those 2-6 chariot archers on the field will be vital towards finishing off the enemy units retreating from your archers.

18 ) Stonehenge - Cost: 120 - Cultural Output: 8 – Stonehenge appears to be very very powerful and heavenly PE ratio.

19) Build in all cities where possible:
Water Mill - Cost: 120 - Maintenance: 2 - Effects: +2 Food, River to construct.
Granary - Tech Requirement: Pottery - Cost: 100 – 1 gold - +2 food
Monument – Cost: 60 - Maintenance: 1 - Effects: +2 Culture
Temple - +2 culture

Build in most/all cities
* If you can build this in normal cities - Courthouse - Tech Requirement: Mathematics - Cost: 200 - Eliminates Unhappiness from an Occupied City. – 5 gold maintenance a turn a turn and takes care of unhappiness early on. You are going to want to rush Mathematics so that you can build a courthouse in your biggest cities to take away enough of your unhappiness.
* If you can't build courthouses in normal cities than you will need to build (Circus/Colosseum) and factor in the social policy (Meritocracy/Military Caste).


Build in cities you have amazing production/ will purchase units
Stable/barracks – Build this in the city you will buy your chariot archers in

20) France gets their first policy 1-2 turns before almost every other civilization. And their second policy 2-5 turns before every other civilization. This can exponentially increase. The problem with this is that France essentially ends up getting far more bonus traits than every other civilization in the early game which ultimately gives France a huge strategic advantage in almost every scenario. They also get more cultural squares for their empire.

21) New best Civs in my opinion:

Amazing
France
Egypt - (No cap restriction for war chariot and war chariots have 5 movements and 6 range attack). This is the best UU in the game by far.

Above Average
Aztec
Japan
Rome
Russia
India

Average
Arabia
China
Greece
Iroquois
Persia
Songhai

Below Average
America
England

Bad
Germany
Ottoman Empire

22) Initial tec path (I will great expand on this gradually, but don't have enough time right now).

Close proximity start

Cost
20 - Agriculture
35 - Animal Husbandry
55 - The Wheel
55 - Trapping
35 - Archery
100 - Mathematics
35 - Mining
55 - Bronze Working
55 - Masonry


Separated start

20 - Agriculture
35 - Animal Husbandry
55 - Trapping
35 - Pottery
70 - Calendar (Get Hendge)
55 - The Wheel
35 - Archery
100 - Mathematics
35 - Mining
55 - Bronze Working
55 - Masonry

Moderator Action: PDMA
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
Considering your love of archers, I fail to see how you think england can be bad when they'll be able to upgrade all their archers too longbowmen (with all their experience) if the game is dragging on, giving your turtle stratergy way more power, and allowing archers more blanket cover of the battlefield...
 
Has anyone told you that you're crazy and not in the good eccentric way but in the really bad way where you think you're some sort of martyred genius posting on a civ5 board and think the developers of the game are out to get you for revealing some secret grand plan?
 
He's just excited as we all are about the release. Some interesting points, I don't agree with them all, but some out of the box thinking for sure.
 
Each turn you get a base number of beakers equal to the combined population of all of your cities. The larger your cities, the more beakers you generate.

So no Libraries, Universities and Observatories? Monestaries?
 
So no Libraries, Universities and Observatories? Monestaries?

All of those buildings can possibly have a place depending on the setting, but generally they will not. The cost/value ratio on those buildings is out of wack in my opinion and rushing those buildings will penalize a player enough, in the short term, to put them in a permanent strategic disadvantage that they may never get to fully utilize the building's potential in the late game.

It really depends on the game, but I am writing all of this for the advanced MP community. This will obviously apply throughout the game in a lot of areas and in single player, but you will soon see that this information is more directly conformed to the typical "MP game."
 
Is #14 (the great people one) confirmed? Wow...huge change if true.

Making GP generation purely deterministic, no random chance of getting an unwanted GP from a mixed gene pool...I can see all kinds of strategies which would take advantage of that. It would make overall GP generation slower, as you do not get to pool all types of GPP to get one randomized GP sooner. But the exact control of which GP types is a big, big change.
 
Do you realize you don't have to write your name in the thread topic? It provides the name of the person who made the thread without you having to explicitly write it. Although, I suppose in your case it makes it a little easier to see which threads to avoid.
 
In regards to defense, an instant 25% fortification bonus is given to units that fortify for a single turn. This enables a strategic loophole allowing defenders to create defensive walls of units. Fortify for 2 turns and you get a 50% defensive bonus lol. Defensive Bonus of the Fort is also 50%. Cities defend themselves at full combat strength so it will become very difficult for weakened units to take a city with a large population, thus supporting defensive strategies. Great general bonuses like citadel / 25% bonus by standing next to units. To sum it up… There are insanely huge bonuses for defenders in this game. This means that if you create a wall of archers/scouts/chariot archers while defending you can get 100%-300% attack bonus on all attacking units

If I'm reading this right, you have listed here a max of 150% on defense if you have a) fortified your unit (50%), b) built a fort in your own territory (50%), c) have a great general next to the unit or two spaces away according to the manual (25%), d) lets say you built a citadel (25%) and finally add your social policy (33%). This is assuming they are additive which is probably correct. Lets add flanking bonuses, at a max of 5 units partially surrounding your defender (which is probably not likely), and with attacker taking up the 6th slot around your unit, for a total of (15x5= 75%). We are now at 258% bonus for a defender on that tile, or anywhere from 198% with one adjacent defender up to 258% for 5 adjacent defenders.

Defensive strength of an archer is 4 (it is on defense, and is being attacked so it will probably be a melee fight). So a defensive strength of anywhere from 7.92 to 10.32 with optimal defense not including terrain modifiers.

When attacking the only bonuses would be flanking (max is now 6x15 = 90%) plus a hill (25%), plus your social policy (33%), for a total of 148% bonus for the attacking unit.

Archer attack is 6, so your best attack is going to be 8.88.

My math is probably very wrong, but hey I tried :)
 
16) If you are the last player in possession of your own original capital you win. So if you capture all other civs’ capitals and hang onto your own, you’ve achieved victory. However, this can be tricky. Suppose you’re in a five-player game and you capture three of your opponents’ original capitals, but the fifth player sneaks in and captures your capital while you’re not paying attention – then he would win immediately. In other words, it doesn’t matter who captures what: it’s the last player holding onto his original capital who gets the victory. LoL

Paragraphs like these make your posts really amusive. Are you actually trying to troll? Because I would consider you a pretty good one as the line between reasonable and unbelievable is very thin in this particular instance.

Just how would, a 1 captial player, vs a juggernaut that has already eradicated 3 opponents, "sneak in" and steal his capital? Maybe you think Ninjas are the super secret unit?
 
I started reading your opening post with great interest, but as I read on, I got a very uncomfortable feeling about what you had written. Let me explain, but first, a few qualifiers:

1. I don't visit this forum often at all, I very rarely read more than one or two posts when I do visit.
2. I have only read the opening post, not any of the replies
3. I have no agenda, except to gain maximum enjoyment from Civ V!

OK, I would also like to further add, I don't know anything about the creator of the thread, from your tone, you appear to be someone of note on these forums, one of the reasons why I wanted to read your post. Also, anyone who writes that length of post, usually has something worth reading to say! So I'll apologise right now, and later, just in case I offend anyone here, that is certainly not my intention!!!

When I started to read, I was very interested as you seem to be pulling some strategies from the manual. I tried to read it (the manual), but fell asleep! The further on I read, however, the more I seemed to feel there was some aggressive agenda underlying this thread, would this be he case?

I will give only one example of a part of the post which made me feel this way, though there are many others, however, this is not supposed to start a tit for tat slanging match, I just want to know if this post is worth studying in detail - I am heavily disabled and my energy is precious and not to be wasted!

The example:

11) Each turn you get a base number of beakers equal to the combined population of all of your cities. The larger your cities, the more beakers you generate. ROFL. If you build an insanely huge army and run cash flow negative…. Don’t worry, it just comes out of your beakers so you can essentially just turn on the war machine and pay for your military with beakers rofl. This game is so dumbed down its scary.

Firstly, the ROFL bit, I don't understand why you find the previous statement so hilarious - should a small town generate as much research as a huge city? As I said, I'm really not trying to start a slanging match where every statement needs to be separated and refuted ad infinitum, please treat these questions as rhetorical!

Next - the
This game is so dumbed down its scary

Forgive me, but wasn't this, in reality exactly the same as in Civ 4? (Not rhetorical, If I'm wrong, tell me!) You would have the little sliders in the top and you set your percentage of wealth and research, thus if you wanted a big army, more than your current settings would pay for, you would slide your research slider down a bit, creating less research and more wealth - they just seem to have taken the need to do this out of the equation, which seems sensible, once your treasury runs dry, it did it automatically for you anyway; or am I completely wrong?

If you are some kind of folk hero around these forums, I apologise for questioning you, hopefully you understand the spirit in which I ask is in no way malicious, it's important for me to know if this thread comes from a neutral standpoint or do you have a chip on your shoulder?

Also I would appreciate being pointed in the direction of other quality strategic/tactical analysis posts, if anyone is willing to forgive my inability to make use of the search function effectively!

Finally, what does PDMA stand for, the reason for moderator action - I couldn't see it in the link provided!
 
Paragraphs like these make your posts really amusive. Are you actually trying to troll? Because I would consider you a pretty good one as the line between reasonable and unbelievable is very thin in this particular instance.

Just how would, a 1 captial player, vs a juggernaut that has already eradicated 3 opponents, "sneak in" and steal his capital? Maybe you think Ninjas are the super secret unit?

Not to mention the 5th player would still have 4 more capitals to capture.
 
@sheng-ji no the TC is not anyone of note on these forums. I have lurked here since civ3 and have seen the rise and fall of many great forum and site members, he is not one of them.

Also, it is my perception as well that the tc intends to veil his anti-civ V sentiment behind this crude interpretation. What is laughable is that he actually asserts some of his interpretations as fact when he couldn't be more wrong. But you astutely pointed out that so I will let that be.

having seen the excellent job the moderators do on this site I can only say that the tc's days are numbered; as he continues to post with the sole intent to irritate or annoy.
 
Not to mention the 5th player would still have 4 more capitals to capture.
Not according to the manual. I agree that it should be so, but the paragraph in MrGameTheory's post comes directly from the manual (so the guys at Firaxis are the trolls in this case :D).

16) If you are the last player in possession of your own original capital you win. So if you capture all other civs’ capitals and hang onto your own, you’ve achieved victory. However, this can be tricky. Suppose you’re in a five-player game and you capture three of your opponents’ original capitals, but the fifth player sneaks in and captures your capital while you’re not paying attention – then he would win immediately. In other words, it doesn’t matter who captures what: it’s the last player holding onto his original capital who gets the victory.

Needless to say, this will most likely lead to numerous abuses and it will probably be several patches before people are satisfied. But that is business as usual when it comes to complex games.
 
Back
Top Bottom