The other Phoenicia themes. I like the medieval a lot.
The greatest contribution the Phoenicians ever made was that they invented the alphabet (albeit with only consonants, given that Phoenician is a Semitic language), which is an easy-to-understand writing system and it led to facilitated trade and communication. Almost all widely used writing systems used today trace their origins to the Phoenician alphabet (the only major writing systems that survive to this day not ultimately derived from the Phoenician alphabet are based on Chinese characters).
Also, while the alphabet as an idea was first standardized in the Phoenician script, the symbols used were essentially simplified Egyptian hieroglyphs. Egyptian hieroglyphs were also used to depict sounds based on either the starting sound of the thing each symbol represented or with a combination. Sometimes they just meant just the thing in and of itself, so the entire system was not standardized and didn't follow rigorous rules. Phoenician traders took some of the symbols, used them explicitly for the sounds and standardized it. So there's definitely a great Egyptian contribution to the invention of the alphabet as well and it was more of a collective effort (as things often are).
And they did technically invent the alphabet. Hieroglyphs are not an alphabet. You are correct that they didn't invent the concept of writing.
Well... while hieroglyphs as a whole (which doesn't exist as a unity) aren't an alphabet, the group contains one. You can write everything perfectly readable with one consonant signs + determinatives which is practically an alphabet. Two and three consonant signs were substituted by one consonant signs in some occasions anyway, sometimes just to make it visually more pleasing. Foreign names were often written with these one consonant signs. The interim stage between hieroglyphs and the Phoenician alphabet, the Proto-Sinaitic script, can be classified as the first alphabet we know of. Yet, as said so often before, firsts aren't that important in history.And they did technically invent the alphabet. Hieroglyphs are not an alphabet.
Worth noting, however, that most linguists agree that the language written in Proto-Sinaitic was still a variety of Canaanite (but not Phoenician).The interim stage between hieroglyphs and the Phoenician alphabet, the Proto-Sinaitic script, can be classified as the first alphabet we know of.
That makes Egyptian hieroglyphics (via the Phoenician alphabet) the ancestor of all modern scripts, excluding Chinese characters, Hangul, and both Kana scripts.A small correction: The Devanagari in India (and any other Brahmic script such as in Thailand) and Hangul in Korea are not based on either the Phoenician alphabet or Chinese characters. Given that they are used by several billion people in total, I'd wager they qualify as "major" as well
Also, while the alphabet as an idea was first standardized in the Phoenician script, the symbols used were essentially simplified Egyptian hieroglyphs. Egyptian hieroglyphs were also used to depict sounds based on either the starting sound of the thing each symbol represented or with a combination. Sometimes they just meant just the thing in and of itself, so the entire system was not standardized and didn't follow rigorous rules. Phoenician traders took some of the symbols, used them explicitly for the sounds and standardized it. So there's definitely a great Egyptian contribution to the invention of the alphabet as well and it was more of a collective effort (as things often are).
EDIT: To correct myself as well, I actually looked up the origins for the Brahmic scripts, and they do in fact descend from the Aramaic (and by extension Phoenician) alphabet, so the first example of the 2 is invalid.
That makes Egyptian hieroglyphics (via the Phoenician alphabet) the ancestor of all modern scripts, excluding Chinese characters, Hangul, and both Kana scripts.
Yes, the Thai script, Cherokee Syllabics, and Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics were ultimately derived from Egyptian hieroglyphics.
Yes, I know that the Phoenicians invented the alphabet and the Greeks invented the true alphabet and that the Phoenician alphabet is based on Egyptian hieroglyphics. There's no doubt that everything is ultimately connected.The alphabet being a phonetic representation of speech is a massive linguistic shift from the semantic hieroglyphics.
It's more accurate to say that the Egyptian hieroglyphs are the ancestor of the alphabet's physical representation, with little connection to its actual functional linguistic applications.
So your statement is only partially true, and even that's stretching it considering the shapes themselves were also massively simplified.
It's still very much correct to say that the alphabet is a Phoenician invention, even if it had a connection to the Egyptian hieroglyphs. Everything is connected in the end.
Now we know why vowels have to be purchased in Wheel of Fortune.Vowels are overrated.![]()