Duke of Awesome
Warlord
but then it wouldnt be historical!
but then it wouldnt be historical!
someone suggested Sweden earlier and im interested in a game where i can actually see Line Infantry in action
Yes, plenty of people did it, and sinitahr posted a detail review of his game with Genoa:Has anyone done Genoa yet?
So, which civ should I do next (Hurry before I decide on my own, you can make a difference! )?
Nice! you could playSorry for not posting for a while, had other concerns on my mind (Magic: The Gathering National Championship for anyone it might mean something to). Been working on an England that will be poster soon after I return from vacation (a week from now). After that I'll do Sweden, although the Norse suck at city placing.
Hey, lets play as Poland.
I don't know if only I cannot manage to play this civ, or this is something natural and everyone has the same problems. I played them 3 times with different strategies, but I'm simply unable to win.
UHV to have the biggest population was impossible for me because of stability and those stupid plagues, from which you cannot defend - neither having good health nor mercantilism and no foreign trade (btw: in Poland historically there were no plague so I don't understand this feature...) - maybe "plague immune" should be a national power for Poland?
UHV to have highest faith points number is hard as well - it is enough work to defend from Barbarians (especially Mongols) as well as neighbours like Norse, Germans, Hungarians or Austrians. You want rather go for barracks, city walls and a lot of military (few times downsides to almost 0 by plagues) than temples, cathedrals etc. You could always switch to orthodoxy or protestantism, but then UHV is gone...
UHV to not loose a city is actually the only one I could achieve.
I don't know, either Poland is so heavy unbalanced or I do something wrong?