He lost every campaign he embarked on, lied about major defeats, and used people like tools. Then he gets recognized as the great hero of the French people. Yeah, some great man.
He lost every campaign he embarked on, lied about major defeats, and used people like tools. Then he gets recognized as the great hero of the French people. Yeah, some great man.
He lost every campaign he embarked on, lied about major defeats, and used people like tools. Then he gets recognized as the great hero of the French people. Yeah, some great man.
Losing all the campaigns (which he technically didn't do) isn't that bad considering he had the greatest powers of Europe allied against him, and he still was the greatest general of the era. He was bound to be defeated, just like Hitler, but what he did accomplish was amazing. He brought prestige back to the French army and peoples, and gave them an awesome national pride, and he installed civil codes and military awards for loyal and brave service. He truly was a great man, not necessarily moral or completely admirable, but he was great.
I would say that Napoleon was a military genius.....and like the vast majority of military greats had a long string of incredible victories only to be eclipsed by a defeat so utter as to wipe away all previous successes.
How many other men in history can say they lost an army of over 600,000 men in an ill-planned winter war in Russia?
We need a compendium:
Never Fight a land war in Asia
Never Fight a winter war in Russia
Never Fight a nuclear war with America
Got any others?
But I truly think that a man who gave the French (Despite his non-French heritage) the dignity of winning a battle needs to be remembered forever. Long live Napolean Dynamite! Err... Napolean Bonaparte!
And he gets kudos for eliminating the Holy Roman Empire.
He lost every campaign he embarked on, lied about major defeats, and used people like tools. Then he gets recognized as the great hero of the French people. Yeah, some great man.
Naopleon the Great. He revolutionized warfare and was a brilliant strategist. He was at his most brilliant 1795 to 1807. later successes were harder to come by for a variety of reasons. He was beaten at Waterloo by the Prussians, not the English.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.