Neo Iv - Classical

[puglover]

Most Trustworthy: Probably Siam. Since they did nothing this entire game!
Most Underhanded: Other than me, I'd say the foul Judeans.
Best Conquerer: Other than me, I'd say Germany
Weakest Empire: Gaul. The first to die.
Largest Empire: China. But only because they started that way.
Best Empire....

Other than me, that would probably be Germany. They were the first and only nation to kick Rome's butt. They also were about to CREAM Carthage.

EDIT: Changed vote for Largest Empire.

 

[Jason The King]

Most Trustworthy
-Erez (tho towards the end I wasn't liking him too much )
Most Underhanded
-Dunno
Best Conquerer
-Erez again cus he conquered and he held the empire.
Worst Fighter
-Dunno
Largest Empire
-Dunno
Best Empire
-Dunno

You should add best economy, best diplomacy, and backstabber.

 

[erez87]

Most trustworthy:
Egypt joking. Hmmm I don't know
Most Underhanded:
What that means??
Best Conquerer:
Rome
Worst Fighter:
hmmm, Persia lol... always starting a war with babylon and signing peace at pre-war borders, always...
Largest empire:
The asians, but they started the largest.......
Best empire:
I don't know, carthage or celts I guss...
Most untrustyworthy EGYPT!

 

[puglover]

Underhanded means sneaky and evil and backstabbing.

 

[china444]

Most underhanded, Most untrustworthy, Worst fighter:

EGYPT my former nation

 

[aaminion00]

Most Trustworthy: Jason the King
Most Underhanded: Erez87
Best Conquerer: Puglover
Weakest Empire: None really
Largest Empire: Finnmaster

 

[erez87]

since when I became sneaky, evil and unthrustyworthy??
Can anyone give a reason for puting me into it?
Egypt was the worse.. swithcing alliances 3 times in 2 turns...

 

[Sgt.Hellfish]

erm im glad that ur all voting on em but i was hoping for more sugestions for catagories to vote on

 

[Finmaster]

C'mon Erez... you did a REALLY ****ty thing to me when the game started. I would most definetly vote you to be the most untrustworthy of this NES. Egypt did what it had to do; you did all the evil things you did because you wanted to.

 

[erez87]

Finmatser, I did somthing ONES.
Egypt did it 3 times because they WANTED... and than surrendered lol...
You did it more! planning to leave your religion only yo get more allies... leaving you ally carthage alone. Attacking on left and right... and so on...
And why talking about us?
Rome was worse and Germany was the worst.

 

[Azale]

do i get anything for surviving like i did?

 

[erez87]

No, cause I helpe dyou survive Was you ally lol

 

[aaminion00]

lol, how was I the most untrustworthy? I just peacefully expanded my territory untill Persia unjustly attacked Abissidia. They offered me an economy level and a chance to gain more land by fighting the ally of a warmongerer. And the other big part was that I was doing it to save you from getting your ass kicked on your western borders.

 

[erez87]

aaminion, I said germany, not you.....

 

[.:KNAS:.]

Germany would not have creamed Carthage. I only surrendered because i thought Judea and Aksum was about to atttack from the east. Mine, Malis (and maybe even some other nations) would have easily repelled Germany/Romes invasion.

I assume all theese have to be player nations?

Most Trustworthy: Huns/Bulgars
Most Untrustworthy: Egypt and maybe Rome
Best Conquerer: Judea
Weakest Empire: Egypt
Most Powerfull: It varied throughout the game. All in all, i'd say the Celts.

 

[Finmaster]

bah! I'm a warmonger because I start one unprovoked war?

I was in 3 wars, yes, but the 2 first I was in only because my ally was in them too. I admit that the third one was unprovoked... but that doesn't make me any more warmongering than any other nation that started an unprovoked war.

EDIT: and when did I "leave Carthage alone" Erez? I did everything I could to help them. It wasn't much, I admit, but that was because I had my own wars to battle. When I could, I always helped my allies - even the Indians who weren't such good allies...

 

[erez87]

The attack on greece was unprovoked.
You signed a SECRET alliance with an ally to make somone else attack him WITHOUT knowing your his ally, and joined against your older ally becuase you just waited for that attack.
Secret allies are not defensinve allies, as no one know about them, and that way, they don't REALY defende... after all, Greece wouldn't attack the Huns if they knew you had an alliance with them... and they didn't knew, so you didn't realy defended your ally...........

And about our first war( when we were allies lol) for both of us, it was an aggresive war lol

 

[Finmaster]

Erez: Greece attacked Huns, if I may remind you. And someone did know about the alliance: I did and Emu (i.e. Huns) did. That makes the alliance valid enough for me. You don't get to chooce which alliances are defencive and which are not. I know that if I have made a defensive alliance, I will keep it wether other people know about it or not. That is irrelevant to me, for it's not the other people who I make the alliance with. The question of would Azale have attacked is irrelevant to me, too. He did attack, and it was an UNPROVOKEN attack. That is enough for me.

Also, my "alliance" with Greece was over the minute when they started plotting with Babylon behind my back. I don't know if you are aware of it but apparently Greece was getting ready to take Turkey from me while claiming that their units were coming to "help" me against Babylon. If they hadn't plotted behind my back I would have never made an alliance with the Huns. So don't put the blame of that on me when I get screwed up by my allies.

I suppose I have to admit that the first war was an aggressive one lol... But I wasn't the one who betrayed his ally during that war

 

[Sgt.Hellfish]

Look this isnt suppsed to spark arguments just let it lie.

Also it seems That KNAS has added most powerfull to the list

 

[puglover]

The most powerful was the Celts/Franks.