ilduce349
(Financial, Philo)
well I have only been narrowly wrong each time...
So care to explain why Boston got to the finals and Chicago didn't...Chicago > Boston.
I mean to say that Chicago's successful teams of yesteryear were more deep and offensively powerful than Boston's team today. Boston currently relies very heavily on the brilliant goaltending of Tim Thomas, in my view, while Chicago had both solid goaltending (though not as good as Timmy, I'll grant) and a powerful, physical offense. Boston's offense so far has only looked good in its two home games, which were each blowouts. So that's something, but overall, I would rather put money on Vancouver vs Boston than Vancouver vs Past Chicago.