Nightfang Mafia (Game Concluded)

[pzelda]

Sorry,
I don't really see choxorn's serious post anywhere.
I guess I can stick with my vote for a wee longer.

 

[choxorn]

Yeah, I don't have any serious posts, or really any strong opinions on anything at this point. I don't have a ton of free time these days. I don't think he's actually directing that at me, though. I don't honestly know who he's directing that at or what he means by it. It's a very strange post.

 

[topsecret]

Ignoring for a second how one moment they're deriding the idea of taking D1 seriously and the next taking D1 quite seriously when somebody who isn't taking it too seriously makes life difficult for them...

Unvote; vote: choxorn

This vote makes no sense. If you had voted me (for joking about people being serious) or Yako (for being serious), I might understand where you are coming from, but voting Choxorn... that just seems random.

 

[pzelda]

Oh, I get it, it starts as a generic rant and ends directed at chox, who voted a bank . Ok, that's somehow understadable. Still it's crap.

 

[AvatarKhepri]

Sorry,
I don't really see choxorn's serious post anywhere.
I guess I can stick with my vote for a wee longer.

The first part of the post is about somebody else. That's why I started it with "ignoring all this junk for now, let's vote somebody else". But I guess that's a bit too complicated a context clue for some people.

 

[AvatarKhepri]

Clarifying: the first part is about Takhisis, who's jokes "let's murder anybody taking D1 seriously" and then wants to hear my super-serious reason for voting them. It's almost like when their life is on the line, suddenly D1 is much more serious. The reason to vote choxorn was twofolkd: one, I wanted to vote myself, and figured I'd vote for somebody who isn't already voting for me, to get them to revenge-vote me, so I could claim it as a bank shot, but that didn't work out; two, I wanted it to be somebody actually doing something weird, and choxorn is the only other person not voting, at least according to the last vote-count.

 

[Takhisis]

You haven't played with me enough, Khepri.

 

[AvatarKhepri]

You haven't played with me enough, Khepri.

I have the opposite opinion on that subject, but you're entitled to your opinion.

 

[Arakhor]

90 minutes left before dusk, folks.

 

[pzelda]

Ok, Avatar, I don't get your reason for voting Chox. Wouldn't it make more sense for you to vote Tak if you have a case?

 

[AvatarKhepri]

Ok, Avatar, I don't get your reason for voting Chox. Wouldn't it make more sense for you to vote Tak if you have a case?

I gave a reason to vote Chox in a later post. I even quoted you at the time. Are you blind, stupid, or malicious? Anyway, "I despise them on a personal level" isn't really a good reason to vote for somebody, which is more or less all I had anyway, and is why I didn't vote them.

Not that it really matters that I was voting choxorn because they're not voting, because at this point my choices are "vote somebody because I think they're suspicious" or "vote for somebody so that I don't die", but the latter assumes I wanna keep playing at all.

 

[Beroli]

Okay, AvatarKhepri is not a vampire unless he's thoroughly patched one of his wolf tells.

Takhisis might be.

 

[pzelda]

I don't know if I want to keep my vote on you with this attitude. Because it's not a wolfy one. Probably.
I was considering a possibility of you being wolves with Tak. The reasons you had were too good as opposed to reasons for for voting Chox.

I guess I could switch to one of Johanna, Robert, Raccoon. I don't have any reason to choose one over the other two, tho.

 

[AvatarKhepri]

"Pissy about being in the running to die" isn't a wolfy attitude? Also, if I'm ever wolves with Tak, you won't have to guess, because I'll start D1 by telling you that, publicly. Also also, my entire reason for considering voting Tak is because I thought it was a tad hypocritical for them to denounce taking D1 seriously and then taking a third vote on them seriously (especially when the original post isn't exactly serious), but at the same time, it's not exactly a scum tell to ask "hey why are you joining my wagon", so I don't know why you consider that single solitary thing "good reasons" when both "good" and "reasons" is objectively false.

 

[AvatarKhepri]

Also also also, changing my vote to Double A or Takhisis would take me out of the running, but neither feels particularly wolfy to me so far, so I'm leaving my vote on Choxorn because they're still not voting for anybody AFAICT.

 

[Double A]

you should vote for tak on principle of him being tak

 

[AvatarKhepri]

you should vote for tak on principle of him being tak

You know what, that's something I'm wrong about. There are multiple reasons to vote Tal
K, they're just both pretty weak.

 

[Takhisis]

I have the opposite opinion on that subject, but you're entitled to your opinion.

If you're going to claim that there is such a thing as playing too many times with me, I am not sure that I want to know why.

90 minutes left before dusk, folks.

Tally?

you should vote for tak on principle of him being tak

You know what, that's something I'm wrong about. There are multiple reasons to vote Tal, they're just both pretty weak.

‘Both’? That doesn't sound like ‘multiple’.

 

[Arakhor]

20 minutes to go. An exit poll suggests the following:

Takhisis: Double A, Topsecret
Double A: Murska, Takhisis
AvatarKhepri: Pzelda, Yakostovian
JohannaK: Rakkoon
Robert Can't: JohannaK
Beroli: Robert Can't
Yakostovian: Beroli
Choxorn: AvatarKhepri

Not Voting: Choxorn

 

[AvatarKhepri]

‘Both’? That doesn't sound like ‘multiple’.

I guess 2 doesn't count as "more than one" to you?