no human choice
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2006
- Messages
- 67
Azale said:Just how do you plan to change human nature, senor?
I am really interested in this one.
i have answered this before.
Azale said:Just how do you plan to change human nature, senor?
I am really interested in this one.
ever heard of crime, war, violence?
those billions are wrong and heading down a path of disaster.
justoneinpower said:yeah, it's called the hundreds of wars that have already happened. what, they are just going to stop for you?
Atlas14 said:Why do you care if billions are headed down a path of disaster? Mind your own business.
CruddyLeper said:Since WW2 (started by UK and France in face of Nazi invasion of Poland) there has been only one year when a UK soldier has NOT died in combat.
Democracy is always at war, from that point of view. It might not be Hollywood epic with millions of combatants, but we've always been fighting.
I suspect that's true of France and the US too. And it's certainly true about Israel. ALL democracies.
Lotta guns get sold just on the threat of war. Work it out.
yeah, that path has worked before. if everyone simply minded their own business, and didn't care about anybody else, this world would be one screwed up place.
Tulkas12 said:You mean thousands of wars, and you mean wars that were generally fought between dictators of one sort or another. I would rather have the human race go extinct than live in perpetual tyranny. Mark my statement here sir, I am the type of person you will have to kill a billion of or so.![]()
Atlas14 said:Sure, democracies have entered wars and inflicted casualties, but rarely do they START wars.
SeleucusNicator said:Somebody hasn't been paying attention to world history after 2001.
There have been far more dictatorships throughout history than there have been democracies, and the distribution of democracies has not been equal across all geopolitical regions. Give it more time; right now we have insufficient data to say anything about different forms of government and their warlikeness.
Tulkas12 said:More time? I concede the ;earning of mankind never ends, but atm the statement can be said and easily supported. . . So why are you arguing against it again?
SeleucusNicator said:My argument is this: you cannot make the argument "because democracies have started fewer wars than non-democracies, democracies are inherently less warlike", because the current empirical dataset is limited in significant ways.
I'm not disputing the empirical data; I'm saying that it is insufficient to draw a rigorous (am I using that word correctly, Perfection?) conclusion.