@acluewithout I have high hopes for the pillage changes, and if it ends up being possible to run an aggressive science/culture/religion game through pillaging without conquering (or at least not conquering very much) then I'll be happy. Even more so if the grievance system isn't too harsh on that kind of non-conquest pillaging. My dream would be to run a one- or two-city Norway game and coastal-raid my way to a non-domination victory as a semi-rogue pirate state.
Even forgetting everything I've said about the Phoenicians and Ottomans, I still think the Maori come pretty close to this criteria. They can cross the ocean faster, they're better at embarking, they're as good or better at launching coastal assaults, they have quicker access to their fishing boat yield boost (even if it is a worse yield), their melee UU comes earlier in the tech tree and is as good or better than the Berserker (depending on attack/defence). On top of that, their UB comes along
earlier, grants
more faith from woods
as well as +2 culture -- and that's for
all woods, not just woods adjacent to the UB -- and it also applies to
all other passable features (which are also buffed by Mana). What does Norway have left? +50% production towards Ironclads?
Maybe the pillage changes will make enough of a difference to counteract some of this (I sincerely hope so), and maybe the no-chopping rule will really hurt the Maori (I'm not a chopper and probably won't notice it at all when I play them). But I really do feel this is a much bigger and more imbalanced overlap than, say, Trajan having a better road-based ability than Cyrus.