Now (scenario of the present world)

Two very small things that might be changed are:

1. Middle AMerica should be Central America.
2. Arabians should be just Arabs.

These are not really wrong or anything, they don'y have to be changed, I just threw them out there in case.
 
I don't understand why Australia is there but not Canada. Canada is part of the 8 most industrialized countries of the world.

It would be cool because we could do scenario of Canada attacking USA like in the South Park movie.

The scenario seem to be great. I am downloading it. :goodjob:
 
I don't understand why Australia is there but not Canada. Canada is part of the 8 most industrialized countries of the world.

It would be cool because we could do scenario of Canada attacking USA like in the South Park movie.

The scenario seem to be great. I am downloading it

Canada is very close to the United States and doesn't have much of a military influence.

Australia has it's own continent! hehe
 
I agree that Austalia isn't more important thatn Canada, but you have to remember that the number of civs is not endless...

And I think it's better to include Canada in North America, and making Australia oceanic..
 
Looks fun but i dont think it does what u want it to. Not very realistic, and its not inevitable countries will be together. NO WAY! No one can predict the future, things happen that change everything. U wanna know what? It would have been a better idea for a realistic world to set the countries by alliances like Nato etc , there are African ones aswell etc. Find them out and then use it.

It aint gonna be possible to build a realistic world scenario unless there is a good diplomacy option. Maybe you can help me on a present world scenario when the new game comes out? I am impressed with most of your work. I respect the map. Great work.

Remember always make Britain its real size on a world map and not almost bigger than India.

Well anyways.
ok then
cya then
 
Hey, I just used a map that looked best in my opinion. But anyway, it's more important that countries' powers are balanced than the fysical geographic things are in order. Like Japan: I made it bigger than it is and still they are actually too weak.

Anyway, I'm very disappointed that I couldn't set up the diplomacy in this scenario, but that's just tough luck.

I've changed Arabians to Arabs. I didn't know about Central America instead of Middle America. I'll change that (based on the fact that your English is most likely better than mine. :o).
 
You know what? You could say that European countries like France, Britain and France are too weak to independent on this game, or Japan. Well Japan is just behind the USA in military spending. Uknow what would make it better? Giving countries like Russia more troops but conscripts and Japan etc more elite troops and up to date equipment.

Well we will have to wait and see if the next civ will have diplomacy. Uknow what? I would love to work on a Korean war scenario when the world was at the brink hehe. Anyways
ok then
cya then
 
Japan is not weak! the Type 90 is the 3rd rated MBT in the world (behind the the German Lepord 2 and the American M1A2) they dont have the massive forces that there neighbors china and russia have but there highly sophisticated forces I agree with Impereza u should make them elite but in less quantity but they shouldnt be weak.
 
Yes, loading the scenario takes very long time. :(

Making the Japanese troops elite might not be such a bad idea. And I also think I'll make some/all Russian tanks regular. They don't have such a good quality army after all. ;)
 
yes yes Russia is not what it once was :( . The only civ I fear in your scenario are the Europeans and the Americans :skull:. Try playing The Middle Easterners and ull se why ;)
 
Looks good, I'm going to download it soon. The problem with doing modern (20th century) scenerios is mainly nukes, I think. The fact that ICBMs can hit anywhere in the world is grossly unrealistic---an ICBM in Russia can't hit south america!!! and I think that the tactical nukes have too small of a range. What the game needs is tacitcal nukes, MRBMs (medium range ballistic missiles), and ICBMs. For example, an MRBM in mexico could hit most of the US, and an ICBM in north korea could hit the western US (I think). The fact that ICBMs have unliminted range can really tip the scales in Civ world power---a tiny country all the way across the map with twenty ICBMs in Civ could cripple the US's military and economy---NOT realistic.

Sorry for ranting, I'm going to download it now, be back in about 2 hours---if your not exaggerating on the load time:cry:
 
I agrre with cgannon64,nukes tip the scale too much and are unrealistic.On my Present Times scenario,I will either edit out nukes (ICBM's) or shorten their range.


A few more suggestions.

1.I would add Australia too either Europe or North America if your going for accuracy,if not,it's fine.

2.You could rename Australia to Oceania.

3.Put a few barbarian camps near Israel to represent the palestian liberation front and maybe a few barabarians in Colombia.

4.Change China's color to red.:p
 
Well, I'm back. *Note* 80 of those 100 minutes were loading time! :eek: Yikes!*Note* And I love it! Congrats, you made my new favorite scenerio (beat out WW2: Europe Front for the coveted spot. I must say, you really did a good job.

I know you said don't comment on geography, but Ireland is connected to England! Is that an accident? Won't affect gameplay too much (or at all), so I wouldn't worry about it.

I'm being Europe, and a pacifist, although I have MPPs with NA and Russia. I'm just waiting for WW3 to break out---I'll be taking bets on who and where it starts. It's inevitable, with the map filled up and everyone MPPing. My bet: Arabs invade Jerusalem. I would---its an ugly hole in their territory.

Anyways, I love it! Hope it makes PTW!
 
My first WW started with Africa going to war against Russia. :confused:

The Arabs had an MPP with Russia so that changed the front lines.
But Europe had an MPP with Africa. :crazyeyes: I was NA and I had an MPP with Europe.
Central America had an MPP with Latin America who had one with Austrailia.
Austrailia also had an MPP with India who went to war against the Africans.

So you had

Europe, NA, Africans vs. Russia, Arabs, India, Central and South America and Austrialia.

I destroyed all of Central America (well, "liberated" it:) ) and the Northern bit of South America.

Europe took Iraq.
Russia took all of Scandanavia.
India took Pakistan/Iran.
Arabs took Ethiopia and the Nigerian area down to Congo.
Middle AMerica is gone.
South America is cut in half.
Africa is now a very MINOR power.
Austrialia didn't do anything.
It was great! :)

FaIaChad - No there are no UUs
 
Daaraa---who were you? I'm dying for a World War to start!!! I'm Europe, MPP'd with NA and Russia, but NO ONE else has MPPs. Its so boring. I don't want to start a World War, I want it do develop naturally like yours did. When did it start? I'm in 3350 BC and there are still no MPPs (besides America and Russia, with me).

I'm quickly not liking this scenerio, as it is getting boring VERY quickly. The PTW editor needs Diplomacy!
 
Give it a chance cgcannon64;).I don't know what scenario your playing,but whenever I play this scenario alliances grow quickly with everybody.
 
Back
Top Bottom