Yes.
That's a good idea.Originally posted by Bruinesian
1. The Indian civ should encompass all the predominantly Indo-Aryan nations like Iran and Afghanistan. You set the precedent with Pakistan. Besides the Muslim religion (though India has the second largest Muslim population in the world), these two countries are tenously linked, in a tribal sense, with the Arabs.
First of all, cities so far off it's main land is quite normal when playing a Civ3 game. Secondly, what should Israël be part of then? It won't be independent!Originally posted by Bruinesian
2. Secondly, Israel part of America?? The two countries may share the same enemies but I disagree that they are that closely linked. Unlike Arab countries, Israel has actually actively spied on the US. Some friend. In addition, it's a bit awkward seeing this US outpost so far away. Hebrews and Arabs may hate each other now, but basically they are all Semitic peoples inheritors of a monotheistic faith.
No, no, no... Some of these countries have nothing to do with each other. I think it's fine the way it is.Originally posted by Bruinesian
3. Some controversy on the OZ v. Canuck designations. Possible solution: Anglosphere! Put the English-speaking countries together under one civ. Includes the British Isles, Canada, US, Australia and New Zealand.
Thanks. But beware for the fact that I'm making a PTW scenario of it myself and don't you dare publishing it!Originally posted by Bruinesian
Overall great map. I'm playing around with it in the PTW editor.
Same answer: I think it's fine as it is.Originally posted by HomeAir
1) Make Canada (remove from the US), Australia and New Zealand part of the English Empire AND remove mainland Europe from the English Empire and make it the EU (standing on its own).
That would only make them less powerful, but to what purpose?Originally posted by HomeAir
2) Break South America into 2. Brazil and the Spanish American speaking countries since Brazil was Portugese. This would give a little more variety.
I've thought about this as well. Please notice yourself that I've only placed irrigation around the Chinese and Indian cities to make the cities as big as possible. (Same for Mexico City, though it's not helping much.) I can't do anything more than that, as I'm simply restricted to their terrain.Originally posted by HomeAir
Russia seems enormous (which it really is) but China seems a little small and India seems really, really small. The 2 latter have half the world's population. I haven't downloaded it so I have to go off what I can see. But just some ideas to throw at you.
Originally posted by Matrix
I've thought about this as well. Please notice yourself that I've only placed irrigation around the Chinese and Indian cities to make the cities as big as possible. (Same for Mexico City, though it's not helping much.) I can't do anything more than that, as I'm simply restricted to their terrain.
1. I wish it were different too.Originally posted by battle ship
i dont like this 1 the load is huge! 2 i play as US and it took forever to set all the citys they were making swordmen and i have to move so many units.3 why dose my civ not no alot of big techs that let me make icbms because i have them but i cant make them and why do i not have space tech.4 when the nukes went flying evertime one wood hit it wood take a long time to load.this was a huge waste of time!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()