Now (scenario of the present world)

I know this might seem a little bit 'nitpicky' but I feel a need to clear things up.

In Canada on this map there are alot of probs. First I noticed that vancouver is positioned directly south of edmonton. Vancouver is a costal city on the pacific. it is also about the same size as seattle.
There is a problem with this map(where did you get it?) The rockies seem to be set too for east and they are kind of split up into two mountain ranges(which is not the way it is in RL).
Edmonton is actually a very productive city(and has 1million pop). If you drive and you live in the states or canada then there is a good chance that your gas was made in edmonton. Another note - Canada's second largest military base is there.
Toronto is larger than montreal at about 3 million people.
The size of Canadas army is somewhere around 65,000 which is not a spit in the bucket compared with the US army(around 300,000 last I checked). Big thing you would want to look into adding for canadian forces on this scen would be Helicopters and Jet fighters since air power is more or less what marks canada as an effective military power.
 
Sorry, I've stopped playing this scenario---it's great, but the turn lengths just really get to me...especially long boring turns of just moving ships!
 
I haven't played the scenario -- but if you're going to have Australia independent, at least link it with New Zealand and call it "Australasia" -- which is the common name for both the countries of Australia, New Zealand -- and surrounding island nations.

Linking both up to Europe would be acceptable if you really had to remove one civilization -- but linking it to the US would be a mistake as it is not at all historically or politically accurate.
 
I like Australia independant but if you had to add to another civ,I would add it to a Western Allies kind of civ (along with Canada and Taiwan).
 
When I try to load the scenario with my scenario editor to change starting nation, it tells me that the file version is incompatible with my editor. But I have 1.29f. Anyone can help me with this one?
 
Ignis, I know there are lots or inaccuracies, but I'm not a geographer. The most important thing is that the power between the different countries is divided as real as possible.

Frimlin, I hope I haven't pissed off New Sealanders, but I just think Australia would be much better known than Astralasia, even if that's technically a better name.

FacelessMan-000, your error is weird. I'm not that much of a technitian, but perhaps you can ask your problem in the Tech Support forum...
 
What are you talking about long loading time? I loaded it in a few seconds with a 56kbit/second modem!!!???

Wizard
 
I was think,maybe South Korea should be part of North America or Japan.I doubt either of these countries would let South Korea catipulate to Chinese rule.:tank:
 
Oooooh, I just thought of something. Did you give the each of the nations their own city lists for any new cities they want to build? I think it would be a nice touch to give them their own regional city lists for any ones not already built. Just something to think of the next time you update the scenario. Once again, great job.
 
Well, both Koreas would be furious if they were Japanese. :undecide: That's why I've given it to China.

And about the city names: I actually should do that, but it's so much work...
 
Do you have the 1.29f patch yet? If you do I don't know what the problem is.
 
Originally posted by Plexus
hey matrix, do you mind if i make another scenario based on this one?
Sure, go right ahead... :)

It appeared my scenario was not included on the PTW cd.
I'm actually not surprised with all the fine work the others made there. :)...:undecide:...:(...:cry:
 
Matrix, I think I accidently used the same map for my scenario as you did for yours. Did you use Kal-els map?
 
Back
Top Bottom