Obama Wiki fiddler caught red-handed

FriendlyFire

Codex WMDicanious
Joined
Jan 4, 2002
Messages
21,761
Location
Sydney
Obama Wiki fiddler caught red-handed

obamaklein_wideweb__470x296,0.jpg


A right-wing pundit has been caught red-handed manufacturing controversy after claiming US President Barack Obama's Wikipedia page was being whitewashed, in a scandal that fooled big news outlets including Fox News.

Aaron Klein, the Jerusalem bureau chief at online news publication WorldNetDaily (WND), reported that Obama's Wikipedia entry was far too positive and did not mention his claimed links with controversial pastor Jeremiah Wright and "Weatherman terrorist" Bill Ayers.

The entry also did not mention concerns surrounding Obama's eligibility to serve as US commander-in-chief due to an alleged lack of proof that he was born in the US, Klein said. But Klein neglected to mention that there was an entire Wikipedia page dedicated to the Obama citizenship claims.

The claims are regarded in the US as conservative conspiracy theories.

Klein claimed Wikipedia's army of volunteer editors were quickly censoring edits on the Obama entry and appeared on Fox News airing the claims.

He reported that a Wikipedia user, Jerusalem21, had attempted to add in the missing details but they were quickly deleted by a Wikipedia administrator for being "fringe" theories. When the user attempted to add the details a second time he was suspended from Wikipedia for three days.

Klein did not identify who owned the Jerusalem21 account but further digging by the ConWebWatch blog discovered that the only entry the user had tried to edit other than Obama's was Klein's. Jerusalem21 had created Klein's entry and edited it 37 times, adding several links and pictures.

Claims that Jerusalem21 was Klein himself are backed up by discussions by Wikipedia administrators on the talk page attached to Klein's entry.

"It reads as a total puff piece and was obviously heavily influenced by Klein himself and cronies/sockpuppets at WND," one wrote.

Further, when questions were raised about the identity of Jerusalem21, Klein edited his original story to remove references to Jerusalem21, replacing them with "one Wikipedia user".

Eventually, in response to emailed questions from Wired News, Klein admitted he had a hand in engineering the facts used to stand up his scandal. But he blamed the Jerusalem21 edits on his researcher.

"I am not 'Jerusalem21', but I do know the Wikipedia user (he works with me and does research for me), and I worked with him on this story," Klein said.

It is not clear whether he was referring to Klein but Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales recently wrote on his Twitter page: "Conspiracy theorists are exhausting. The facts mean nothing to them; their pursuit of a villain trumps all. Any response only brings ire."

WorldNetDaily has a history of attacking Wikipedia and Obama. At the time of writing, two of the lead stories on the site are headlined "Obama earns an 'F' on performance" and "Has Obama been snubbing U.N. chief?".

In December, WorldNetDaily editor Joseph Farah, miffed that his Wikipedia entry had been modified to include a line that he was a "noted homosexual", wrote an opinion piece labelling the free encyclopedia "a provider of inaccuracy and bias" and a "wholesale purveyor of lies and slander unlike any other the world has ever known".

In May last year, another article accused Wikipedia of promoting porn by including "detailed photos of nude homosexual men engaging in sex acts and a variety of other sexually explicit images and content".

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2009/03/11/1236447270592.html
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=91114
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama_citizenship_conspiracy_theories

The internets serious business.
 
soooooooooooooooo, isn't that just telling us what we already knew?
 
Aw. I thought this article would be about some goon within the Obama administration fiddling around with articles, not the obvious. :(
 
Wikipedia......It's Wikipedia!

I honestly don't get the story here? I am having this growing dislike of people who think Wikipedia is "serious business"
 
Lets see what their headlines are today:

BORN IN THE USA?
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Scalia: You need 4 votes
for Obama eligibility case
Lawyer confronts justice
about prez's qualifications
--WND




WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Why are there still questions about qualifications?
Arguments of president's defenders never actually addressed eligibility
--WND

WorldNetDaily Exclusive
What congressmen say about eligibility
Lawmakers' letters insist 'president was born in Hawaii'
--WND

WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Eligibility issue sparks 'edit war'
Wikipedia blocks users from posting criticism of Obama
--WND

WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Is Snopes.com infallible?
If website calls Obama eligible, then he must be, right?
--WND

WorldNetDaily Exclusive
Join 320,000 others in seeking citizenship proof
Petition demands verification of Obama's eligibility
--WND

MAGNETIC MESSAGE
WorldNetDaily Exclusive
You can prove where you were born ...
Spread the word – Obama could easily end questions
--Shop.WND.com

Clearly Obama's birth certificate is the most tremendous and groundbreaking news story of note right now.
 
smooth GOP real smooth...
 
smooth GOP real smooth...

People taking Wikipedia seriously to the point of thinking it's newsworthy is not the fault of the GOP.
 
I guess they haven't discovered Conservapedia yet...

http://www.conservapedia.com/Obama

175px-Features_ayers1.jpg


180px-Barack_Obama_Jeremiah_Wright.jpg


At least they got rid of the Obama smoking photo...

And get this:

During the democratic primaries the Clinton Campaign lead a smear campaign against the validity of Barrack Obama's Hawaii Birth cirtificate, claiming that it is false and that he is ineligible for Presidency. [187] After initially refusing to produce a birth certificate in response to such rumors, the Obama campaign eventually endorsed a document posted on the Daily Kos as authentic.[188] The response is split regarding the birth certificate. Some commentators, such as those at the National Review, are satisfied with the document.[189] However, some analysts claim that the birth certificate is false.[190]

On August 21st, 2008, Factcheck.org published an article regarding the controversy.[191] The site stated, "FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship." In addition, the site posted high-resolution photographs of the birth certificate, which clearly showed the raised seal, stamp of Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka, and certificate number. The birth date corresponds to a birth announcement published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Sunday, August 13, 1961. [192]

A Philadelphia attorney, Phillip Berg, has filed a lawsuit against the DNC and Barack Obama. Berg maintains that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls "dual loyalties" due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. The "dual loyalties" which have not been shown to exist do not violate any constitutional or legal precedents and would make Sen. Obama a poor choice for President, not an invalid choice.

Obama website Fight The Smears has confirmed that Obama was once a Kenyan citizen until 1982. Attorney Philips Berg's lawsuit is being challenged by the Obama Campaign. Instead of producing the original birth certificate in court and paying a number of legal fees and taking several days out of his busy campaigning schedule the Obama campaign had the case dropped on the grounds that it lacked any supporting evidence. [193] The fact that Mr. Berg's dual arguments were mutually contradictory may also have contributed.

The state of Hawaii announced that the document is legitimate and official. Since the state of Hawaii is the issuing body they have ultimate authority with regards to the matter.[194]

Common sense and reason from Conservapedia? Oh noes! What are we left to laugh at? Fox News?
 
Back
Top Bottom