Redcoat?

kristopherb

Protective/Charismatic
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
2,218
Location
British Empire Soul:Tesco
This is not a tread complaining about the redcoat.
When i first Heard of Civ 4 unique unit sysytem i assumed that the English UU whould be either Longbowmen or Iron sides.
What do you think should be the English UU
Redcoat
Longbowmen
Iron side
other
 
Redcoats were during Englands 'Golden Age'. I don't see why ironclads are unique to england. Longbow aren't, um.., really important enough. It helped conquer the islands, but redcoats conquered the world.

Iron sides (cromwells cavalry)
 
Never heard of 'em Ironsides, reason enough that it's not them - and sure, the English mastered Longbows, but:
1) Longbows are too powerful already - make a Longbow UU, and it'll either be overkill or not so important that you'll really need it.
2) Redcoats were in the English "golden age"
 
This is not a BtS problem. Redcoats have been in the game since civ 4 (well, civ 3 actualy); and BtS hasn't modified them in anyway. This really should be in the Civ General discussion and not in the BtS forum. And I'll think that you'll find quite a few threads which discuss this already there.
 
The OP is right that any of those could be perfectly valid UUs, but ask any former Colonial, especially us Americans ("The Redcoats are coming!") what the most iconic British unit would be and it's clear. You guys wore those snazzy uniforms for the several hundred years that you had your world-spanning empire.

So, sorry, but that's what you're going to be remembered as =P



I just wish they still had 16 strength still.... *sigh*
 
I think the Redcoats are the appropriate units for the British (errr English), but I do not find them overly useful anymore.
 
How many people use riflemen/redcoats, anyway? I always end up getting Infantry about twelve turns later, so they aren't useful for very long. It seems like the Riflemen, Cuirassiers, and Grenadiers are obsolete as soon as you get them.

Redcoats have been in the game since civ 4 (well, civ 3 actualy);

IIRC the English UU in Civ3 was a ship, based on the Frigate.

and BtS hasn't modified them in anyway.

They're different from vanilla Civ4 though; they now have no more strength than the unit they replace. Together with their +25% vs gunpowder units, they used to be fairly overpowered (reminds me of Civ3 Immortals); now they're just fairly good, depending on circumstances.
 
I think the Redcoats are the appropriate units for the British (errr English), but I do not find them overly useful anymore.

I think they're an ok UU. Not too powerful, but not weak either. Slightly more powerful than the Rifleman, but doesn't really represent much of an advantage. Lol. I like the uniform though :D
 
IIRC the English UU in Civ3 was a ship, based on the Frigate.
Sorry, my mistake, I used to play a mod that replaced all sea and air UUs by land UUs.

They're different from vanilla Civ4 though; they now have no more strength than the unit they replace. Together with their +25% vs gunpowder units, they used to be fairly overpowered (reminds me of Civ3 Immortals); now they're just fairly good, depending on circumstances.

That change was made with Warlords, not BtS. But my point is that the OP isn't complaining about their stats, but about their very inclusion; which is a Civ4 matter and not a BtS one.
 
i don't understand why redcoats are represented as riflemen...weren't they musketmen? if they wanted to go with riflemen, maybe the rangers would have been a better choise...
 
Redcoats were during Englands 'Golden Age'. I don't see why ironclads are unique to england. Longbow aren't, um.., really important enough. It helped conquer the islands, but redcoats conquered the world.

Though some "creative counting" is now believed to have taken place, reference the 100 years war including the Battle of Agincourt for the reverence the *English have towards the Longbow.

Hell just read Shakespeare's Henry the V.....

"We few, we happy few, we band of brothers."

[*thats right English..the "Redcoat" is a British Unit]
 
No, it's an English unit. And England owns Britain anyway. That's right, Scots and Welshies! You're mere peons. Vassals! Mahahaha!
 
No ET it is an English unit in-game, a British unit historically, which is the context I used.

As an aside, I served as a Grenadier Guard, the quintessential Redcoat I guess;)

( Of course later I defected to the colonies, namely the U.S....but thats another story)
 
I agree that the (Welsh initially) Longbowman could well be used as a British UU..... as could a Ship of the Line.... but the redcoats are pretty iconic and were definitely the UU at the heyday of British expansionism.
 
i don't understand why redcoats are represented as riflemen...weren't they musketmen? if they wanted to go with riflemen, maybe the rangers would have been a better choise...

First they were armed the muskets, then, during the 19th century, with rifles.
 
I think the Redcoats are the appropriate units for the British (errr English), but I do not find them overly useful anymore.

They're really good with Churchill. If you have a few soldier producing cities ready, and you pump them up with feudalism/theocracy, you'll get a unit that comes out kicking with a few drill promotions. Add to that the charasmatic trait, and you'll be able to build units that can handle a lot of different situations.
 
Ill actually prefer an English Longbow. English achery are the strongest in Europe, second to the Mongol and/or Turks. Plus it is a real English unit. The greatest exmaple of English Achery Sumpremancy was the Battle of Agincourt
 
Top Bottom