Relationships between AI Civs

Donald23 who is in the Frankenstein Test Group has confirmed -over at the We Play Civ site- that when you are on leader x's screen; the views presented there are the other leaders views of leader x.

Thanks Donald23!
 
It'd be nice to have a relationship screen in the reports tab which allows us to flick from leader to leader, and reverse whether we see what they think of others or others think of them at the click of a button, more like CIV. I suspect the UI will get a bit of an overhaul with the first expansion... :hammer2:
 
Yeah :undecide: Great people...but definitely not enough...
 
I only check this forum when I don't have time to play (I can usually play only during the weekend) but anyway this wasn't a very serious comment.
 
Its weird, a denouncement is showing both ways. The way I have always considered it is it is their view of other civs amd that assumption has always worked for me but nothing proven.

I'm not sure the game makes a distinction here. Doesn't it appear exactly the same for the player? If I denounce it shows a red anger head and same thing if an opponent denounces me. With other diplomatic states there might be differences but I'm not sure how that works.
 
I'm not sure the game makes a distinction here. Doesn't it appear exactly the same for the player? If I denounce it shows a red anger head and same thing if an opponent denounces me. With other diplomatic states there might be differences but I'm not sure how that works.

Denouncements, Declared Friends, Allies, Defensive Pacts - these are all mutual.

Unfriendly, Neutral, and Friendly can vary (as evidenced in the pictures I attach at the beginning of this thread :p ).
 
I usually check the forum when I'm waiting for my turn...

Nice to know it works just as ours icons do.
 
Donald23 who is in the Frankenstein Test Group has confirmed -over at the We Play Civ site- that when you are on leader x's screen; the views presented there are the other leaders views of leader x.

Just who is this Donald and why should we believe him?

I state this because of the following I have just found

Gorgo shows this
upload_2017-4-1_20-51-32.png


Monty Shows this
upload_2017-4-1_20-52-57.png


Saladin Shows this
upload_2017-4-1_20-53-54.png


If I ask Gorgo for a joint war she offers Saladin and Monty as options
If I ask Monty for a joint war he offers Saladin and Mvemba
If I ask Saladin for a joint war he offers Cleo, Mvemba and Monty

Its is pretty clear from this you will only get a joint war against civs a civ dislikes or hates
I therefore pose I have tested this (twice) and am now pretty sure it is the civs view of other civs you are looking at

This test is done from the same save there is a bug I spotted in so you can check the .sav at
https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/1-0-0-129-cleo-is-deluded.613406/

I have no idea who the Frankenstein group is but I am now in a situation I could joint war with you against them (same points as a Casus)
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-4-1_20-52-18.png
    upload_2017-4-1_20-52-18.png
    9.8 KB · Views: 59
Last edited:
Re Donald23 first - here he is in the credits of the game. Clearly they are a test group, as in there are people more qualified to comment; but I doubt we're going to hear from them anytime soon :undecide: And I doubt Donald would be wrong....
Spoiler credits :

20170323111458_1.jpg


As to your proposal, I can't say that you are wrong. It would be helpful if you uploaded Mvemba & Cleo's relationships too, so we can see what is there. To play the devils advocate against you from the info you have given us; maybe some civs will offer war even when neutral as in the case of Gorgo. That would fit her personality in the game.
It is always interesting who the Civs will go for a joint war against. I should keep a better track of it as you have been doing.

Moderator Action: Large image wrapped inside spoiler tags -- Jon
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited:
It's funny how no one here who's more likely to be in the know wants to comment on this...
 
I see it like this.

My testing seems to be correct but I am also seeing the smileys are missing sometimes and there are other bugs.
If I have such are hard time working out the validity,mdid the Frankenstein group even go near this... I doubt it.
It is very tempting and easy for anyone to state something as fact from experience, its natural and not always right
I guess Ill just keep an eye on it moving forward which I am doing in my current game. I just pop in every now and then and see who people are willing to joint war,seems an eady way to check
Given up testing at the moment as its really boring and I am busy anyway
 
If I have such are hard time working out the validity,mdid the Frankenstein group even go near this... I doubt it.

I just figure in their extra hours of playing the game over the previous whatever length to release, that they would have clarified this with their Firaxis contacts.
 
Back
Top Bottom