knighter999
Chieftain
yeah i have to agree. DoC is pretty predictable. RFC CW is pretty unpredictable...
RFC Classical World
- Thread starter srpt
- Start date
I have no internet at home right now so I can't do any svn commits. here is a patch though with some updates.
Visigoth UHVs made harder. longer tech path to Jurisprudence and shorter timelines for all goals.
dawn text for the Jin, Visigoths, Ostrogoths and Vandals
I will work more on the post-Roman west this weekend
Visigoth UHVs made harder. longer tech path to Jurisprudence and shorter timelines for all goals.
dawn text for the Jin, Visigoths, Ostrogoths and Vandals
I will work more on the post-Roman west this weekend
Theodorick
King
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2006
- Messages
- 624
I see the celts survive and thrive way too often for it to be historical. Also rarely do I see the Romans give them a hard time. I don't mind seeing an occasional civ wiggle out of its history and surprise me, but for the celts this happens almost every game. The worst example for me has to be when they were invading the Eastern Roman Empire. I was playing the Sassanids, and was frankly surprised when the Constantinople fell to the celts. I opened up the world builder, and the the celts had an Empire from Spain to Anatolia!
DC123456789
Deity
I think we still need more Roman buffs. Although I do agree that strong Celts are one of their main obstacles- conquerors would be nice.
knighter999
Chieftain
quick question, is Eastern Rome supposed to be at war with Western Rome at the start along with the Kushan? I started as egypt one and changed to eastern Rome in 330 AD. things went bad instantly. i was losing 256 gold per turn and much stronger Western Roman units were crushing my cities. it seems nearly impossible to win right now... maybe a peace treaty would be nice
Cetrix
Merovingian
Yes I agree, but Rome fails 9 times on 10 with celts, which make a wide empire.
I remember that srpt wanted to prevent irrealistic wars (China versus celts... etc).
Yes ! More for late game ! Thank you.srpt said:
DrZomboss
Brrrainz Gourmet
Karakorum should be 3 S from Karabalasagun
DrZomboss
Brrrainz Gourmet
I think something is really wrong - civs merely don't have any choice where to find a city! For example, playing as the Gokturks, I've founded Karabalasagun and Otuken but then, no places! I didn't know where to go with the remaining 2 settlers... Please also make the AI found cities where they can : Rome shouldn't always find Pompeii and Iulia Aemona. Please make it varied 
... Oh, and a much better version of the 550 AD scenario : changed city names to what it SHOULD be!
... Oh, and a much better version of the 550 AD scenario : changed city names to what it SHOULD be!Create the Gokturk Khaganate
! I send The 2 other settlers to Kazakhstan, at the lake Balkhash that there are some resources 
edit: Speaking of The Gokturks, I came up to an idea for a new UP. OK obviously the horse spawn is a great one, but after a while you can trade it with everything you want as it is a very important resource. My idea is to make each province's area that you control (that is, every city in this province is yours) to sum up in your total area. This will help em achieve the hard second UHV.
Example, if all the cities in the Sarmatian and Mongolian steppes are yours, then all these provinces is yours and their percentage of world area is assumed to be yours as well!
Of course this will require the 2nd goal to change and make it greater, like 10% or even 15%
What do you think?
DrZomboss
Brrrainz Gourmet
I've noticed some city names were used, but with the greater map they aren't here anymore
Very accurate India map:
Very accurate India map:
Spoiler :
DC123456789
Deity
@DrZomboss
Could you also put some of those city names on the map yourself? Not to be rude, but it does kind of seem like a waste that you go a find all these maps, and they never really get used...
Could you also put some of those city names on the map yourself? Not to be rude, but it does kind of seem like a waste that you go a find all these maps, and they never really get used...
DC123456789
Deity
Yeah, production overall has been quite nerfed. The entire game feels like it runs on epic rather than normal. Most civs, though, usually have one or two decent production cities, but many of the starting ones have practically no production without any improvements. As you improve the land most of these cities will have okay production, especially since villages and towns now give production as well. Specialists have also been buffed, so high-food cities aren't bad either.
Cetrix
Merovingian
Yes, early game with 320BC scenario is slow. But if early civs come to late game, the production is really too high compared to newborn civs. Example : Sassanids which get crushed by Parthia.
Actually I think it's OK to have this choice :
- Build army, but slowly, for the early game and take an advantage.
- Don't build army, only some mercenaries for emergency, and focus on economy.
Better than spamming troops to win.
Actually I think it's OK to have this choice :
- Build army, but slowly, for the early game and take an advantage.
- Don't build army, only some mercenaries for emergency, and focus on economy.
Better than spamming troops to win.
Cetrix
Merovingian
@DC123456789 : I tried to make my own map.ods but I failed. 
I only have OpenOffice, not Exel.
Are you able to do a new map.ods like in the svn ? This way, I will work on it as soon as possible.
I only have OpenOffice, not Exel.Are you able to do a new map.ods like in the svn ? This way, I will work on it as soon as possible.
DC123456789
Deity
Here's my working copy. The CNM itself is exactly the same as the one I uploaded earlier. Note that the map itself is not complete- I've only done North Africa and part of the Middle East, but it should be fairly easy to construct the rest of the map using the game.
DrZomboss
Brrrainz Gourmet
