RFC Epic/Marathon
- Thread starter embryodead
- Start date
Shall we pick the subject up there instead?
ilduce349
(Financial, Philo)
Which files do I need to change to get from 0.4 to 1.1. I recently finished modding this game and don't want to download this if I need to restart my mod.
embryodead
Caliph
You should, because research in 0.4 was quite badly broken!
To see what files have changed and to easily merge them with your mod, use http://winmerge.org/
To see what files have changed and to easily merge them with your mod, use http://winmerge.org/
ilduce349
(Financial, Philo)
Thank you
OK, new idea.
Starting at war with another civ is IMO useless for the human player.
I do agree that if a newborn civ is AI, then some civs should have a chance for war on spawn to help make things more historical. However, maybe this is just me, but I usually play to be pretty historic, so I don't need automatic war with nearby civs. Another thing this prevents is getting a DOW on turn 2 when cities flip - therefore no extra units.
So, I propose implimentation of a new rule that prevents automatic war on spawn if the newborn civ is human.
The way I see it: either have one or the other (either chance for war on spawn or chance for war on city flip,) not both. Of course, I would prefer the second option, because then you still get the extra units for liberation.
Does anyone else agree?
Starting at war with another civ is IMO useless for the human player.
I do agree that if a newborn civ is AI, then some civs should have a chance for war on spawn to help make things more historical. However, maybe this is just me, but I usually play to be pretty historic, so I don't need automatic war with nearby civs. Another thing this prevents is getting a DOW on turn 2 when cities flip - therefore no extra units.
So, I propose implimentation of a new rule that prevents automatic war on spawn if the newborn civ is human.
The way I see it: either have one or the other (either chance for war on spawn or chance for war on city flip,) not both. Of course, I would prefer the second option, because then you still get the extra units for liberation.
Does anyone else agree?
embryodead
Caliph
VC works with this mod, there is nothing to merge. Only problem is with the latest version of VC for RFC comes as a standalone mod, not a module, so you have to copy the files manually from one mod to the other, basically install it like the old VC RFC versions.
merijn_v1
Black Belt
I can (try to) do this. But I want to improve my 2nd UU, UB module before I'll start with it. (I hope this modules will come this week, but I can't promise anything.)
embryodead
Caliph
Nothing special has to be done, really, just installed it in 1 min.:
1. Download RFC VD
2. From RFC VD/Assets copy the "Modules" folder and the three FPK files to RFCMarathon/Assets
3. Open RFCMarathon/RFCMarathon.INI in notepad and change ModularLoading from 0 to 1
Enjoy RFCMarathon VD
1. Download RFC VD
2. From RFC VD/Assets copy the "Modules" folder and the three FPK files to RFCMarathon/Assets
3. Open RFCMarathon/RFCMarathon.INI in notepad and change ModularLoading from 0 to 1
Enjoy RFCMarathon VD
admtanaka
Warlord
Has anyone noticed any issues playing the 3000 BC start on epic? My first game had Christianity founded in Paris...
embryodead
Caliph
What speed? Slower games will never be ideal reflections of normal, i.e. if France gets the tech first, it founds Christianity, technically no problem here as long research rate follows the timeline. From all my tests, it does now, though the slower the game, the more randomness.
admtanaka
Warlord
It was epic. It surprised me, because doesn't Spain spawn first? They should both have Theology, no?
embryodead
Caliph
That's possible, and since latest RFC patch holy cities are never erased, so it'd stay there and flip to France.
admtanaka
Warlord
Pretty fortunate for the French, certainly. That must be what happened. It goes to show you how much differently the game unfolds with more turns, because it's very rare in base RFC that Rome conquers that much of Gaul.