[R&F] Rise and Fall General Discussion Thread

I don't think they'll neglect Africa this expansion; a new civ for the continent is definitely a possibility but they have so many mainstays that I think they'll bring back a returnee first. Of the previous African civs I think the Zulus are the least likely, since we not only have the Mongols but now Chandragupta as early/mid game warmongers; the same goes for Songhai for similar reasons.

Traditionally, Carthage has alway been in the first expansion, as it has been for Civs III-V. For this reason alone I'd say it's a likely bet for RnF; the only issue I see with it is that it traditionally is also a militaristic civ like the Mongols and Chandra, but even then it usually has a commercial bent to it as well that could easily distinguish it.

If not Carthage then Morocco and Mali also are possibilities for a commerce-leaning African civ, with Morocco also having some sort of religious component like in V. Ethiopia/Axum has the precedence of being in 2 previous games rather than 1 like the other two; on the other hand, VI seems to be pulling a number of civs absent from V like Khmer and Sumer, which kind of balances the two points out. So in terms of African representation, I would personally rank likelihood as follows:

Carthage > Mali = Ethiopia > Morocco > Zulu > Songhai

With 4 spots left I'd say the Ottomans and Inca (or Maya, but my personal bet is on the Inca) are fairly good bets. Carthage would be the most likely African civ, with Mali and Ethiopia not far behind. I do also think the last spot will be a European civ simply because there are a lot of fan favorites yet to return (...or be introduced). I don't see Portugal and the Netherlands in the same expansion since they're both colonial commercial civs. Italy and Georgia are both popular here, and while I won't put too much stock into such hopes, I won't rule them out either.

________

Conservatively estimating that Xpac-2 will also only introduce 8 civs, this would total 42 total civs; of these 6 are new (Kongo, Macedon, Nubia, Scythia, Australia, Cree, and not counting Norway). If each Xpac brought only 1 new civ so that Civ VI introduces 7 new civs total, this means there would be 35 returning civs (42 - 7) from previous entries. Further discounting Khmer and Sumer, this would be 33/43 civs returning from Civ V. This doesn't take into account the Sioux, Hittites, or Mali (or the HRE for that matter), but in essence it means that if both Xpacs are similar then Civ VI would cut 10 civs from V. I find this quite unlikely, as civ-cutting has never before happened on this scale between any iteration of the series. Civs are very rarely removed; in fact, before VI it has only happened 7 times in total, and at most 4 in one transition (Sioux from II -> III; Hittites & Iroquois from III -> IV; Khmer, HRE, Sumer, & Mali IV -> V). This estimate also is very conservative in assuming that each xpac will only have 1 new civ, so even if Xpac-2 has more civs total, it's unlikely that this number is far off the mark.

This is what makes me think that there will either be a 3rd expansion or additional post-xpac DLC; there are simply too many civs that have yet to return; not even counting Sioux/Hittites/Mali, they would have to cut ~10 civs from V's roster with this rate of civ addition. It's a tall order (ie: cut Shoshone, Huns, Songhai, Siam, Assyria, Venice, Polynesia, ...Sweden? Morocco? Austria?) But I think it's far more likely they cut a few civs and sneak in the rest in other, DLC/xpac-related ways.
 
That said... We have 8 Civs (and 1 leader) representing:
  • 1 North America
  • ? South America
  • 1 Europe
  • ? Africa
  • ? Middle East
  • 3 East Asia
  • ? Oceania & Pacific
So how do the last 4 Civs fit in? 1 for each region? So Inca, Carthage, Ottomans and Tonga?

Wow, getting a refund, this expansion pack is so East-Asia-centric

But seriously, I just realised so far we've had only 1 European nation, and the ratio is very low.
 
I just had a sudden and terrible thought.

What if the trailer was gauging interest in FUTURE dlc civs? After releasing the trailer, Firaxis would know now that there would be significant interest in Portugal, Italy, and Georgia as DLC civs, and they did it without ever having to put a poll up and listen to whining about why CIV X didn't get included over WHATEVER
That would be an interesting idea. Too bad Sean Bean and his daughter didn't go into the wilderness to trade for furs.
 
I really hope to see Switzerland one day without mods. A civilization bound to no war would be extraordinary fun to play!

I actually really enjoy this idea, though I wonder how it would work in principle. There is no "leader" of Switzerland.. kinda like the EU from what I understand. It'd have to have multiple leaders, no? Would the leaders be a Federal Counsel of Governors? :crazyeye:

Sometimes a ship is just a ship.

I'm still not discounting the possibility of Portugal. We haven't seen Lisbon yet, right?

True, though in the first scene there is an armillary sphere, an elemental national symbol of Portugal. It's on the coat of arms between two olive branches (olives confirmed). The mariner's astrolabe, the shipwreck scene that resembles a canto of the Lusiads which took place in the area of that new feitoria world wonder... In my mind it's Portugal essentially confirmed.

Coat_of_arms_of_Portugal.png
 
So with 5 more full Civs to go (of which 1 is known to be Cree) I think now will be a good time to recap on city-states which we've yet to see and get overly hyped up about thinking that they will be the final 4 unknown Civs:

So far we have not seen in any R&F media:
  • Armagh (Celts or Ireland)
  • Bandar Brunei (I don't think this one has been seen; but it's unlikely it will be a Civ atm)
  • Carthage (Carthage or Phoenicia)
  • Hong Kong (Hong Kong - in my mind, the most unlikely city state to become a Civ)
  • Jerusalem (Hebrews, Israel or Palestine)
  • Kandy (Sri Lanka or Tamal Kings)
  • Kumasi (Ghana)
  • La Venta (Olmecs)
  • Lisbon (Portugal)
  • Nan Madol (Tonga/Lapita, Kosrae, Micronesia, Melanesia or Polynesia)
  • Toronto (Canada)
  • Valletta (Malta or 'Sea peoples')
  • Yerevan (Armenia or Georgia?)
I've also highlighted the two most obvious ones which most likely to return at some point.

That said... We have 8 Civs (and 1 leader) representing:
  • 1 North America
  • ? South America
  • 1 Europe
  • ? Africa
  • ? Middle East
  • 3 East Asia
  • ? Oceania & Pacific
So how do the last 4 Civs fit in? 1 for each region? So Inca, Carthage, Ottomans and Tonga?

Still waiting for that Italian civ, whether that's wishful thinking or not... Portugal can wait *pls dont kill me*
 
and Georgia as DLC civs

Please no Georgia. I really don't want to see this as a civ. I don't know why everyone keeps going on and on about them.
 
Please no Georgia. I really don't want to see this as a civ. I don't know why everyone keeps going on and on about them.

It's one of quite old civs. It was very influential in some period of time, including major role in defeating Seljuks during Queen Tamar reign. Georgia and Tamar are way more historically significant than Zulu, for example.
 
It's one of quite old civs. It was very influential in some period of time, including major role in defeating Seljuks during Queen Tamar reign. Georgia and Tamar are way more historically significant than Zulu, for example.
Tamar would make an excellent choice for Civ VI, as I said numerous times. One reason why Tamar was not in earlier Civ games is because some of those games featured another Georgian, albeit leading Russia.
 
Who do you think is most likely to lead Portugal this time?

Maria I, Maria II, Henry the Navigator, João II, João IV, someone else?

João IV is my favorite Portuguese leader. He would be great for territorial expansion despite distance. It'd be pretty cool if they had some mechanic for proximity to a city with a feitoria gives loyalty. Honestly, that's essentially their purpose. Trade routes to a city with a feitoria boosts loyalty to Portugal, encouraging a city to flip in favor of Portugal, no matter distance. Do we know the yields of the Husuni Kubwa (or do they call it Kilwa Kisiwani)? That would have been the height of the Quíloa (Kilwa) ceramics trade, though the Portuguese essentially abandoned most of their trade posts in Africa north of Moçambique because geographically they aren't worth as much on a trade route to India because they're out of the way & because the Sultan of Malindi ended up being a backstabber.

Maria II would be fascinating should she inherit an ability to keep the territory loyal despite being in a dark age, kind of like Alexander though I wonder how the "rise" or "fall" will affect gameplay for Macedonia. Other than that, she didn't amount to much aside from popping out babies.

Still waiting for that Italian civ, whether that's wishful thinking or not... Portugal can wait *pls dont kill me*
:shifty::shifty: Venice is coming :shifty::shifty:
 
Wow, getting a refund, this expansion pack is so East-Asia-centric

But seriously, I just realised so far we've had only 1 European nation, and the ratio is very low.

The base game was extremely Europe-heavy, though (and, considering how rich the region is in the potential civs department, particularly East Asia-light.)

I'm hoping there's only one more European civ in the pack at most, and I'd prefer no more at all (at least from Western Europe). Basically I just want a sub-Saharan civ and/or another North American civ, although I'm trying not to get my hopes up too much-- these seem to me the regions still in need of urgent love. (I <3 me some Carthage but I don't think they should count... they were basically Phoenicians. Having Carthage be the "African" civ with Cleopatra as the leader of Egypt will start to feel a little much-- Africa shouldn't be half outside holdings when there's so much richness to pick from, when you don't have big, obvious picks in the game like Mali, or Ethiopia, or Ghana, or the Songhai, or the Zulu, and so on..... Carthage in addition to a sub-Saharan civ, now.... :thumbsup:)
 
Back
Top Bottom