Saddam Hussein Scenario

Is there any way to change the civ you play as? I tried setting the "human player" checkmark in Player properties, but when I start my game it immediatly shows that "You have suffered a humiliating loss". I'm completely lost as to what to do.
 
Originally posted by tribune militum
Is there any way to change the civ you play as? I tried setting the "human player" checkmark in Player properties, but when I start my game it immediatly shows that "You have suffered a humiliating loss". I'm completely lost as to what to do.

that was weird, what civ did you those?
 
The "embarrasing defeat" appears for the Caucasian nations, the former rebublics. And I also noticed there is a message America has been defeated when you play as someone other then the Americans (when I put them as human player, there were no problems). As for the Caucasians I even swithced the difficulty from Warlord to Chieftain to see if there is any difference. I still got the Embarrasing defeat as the scenario was loading...
 
Originally posted by Nitro_3985
Two questions,

1) can't you give do the upcoming war with Iraq but give Iraq some Tactical Nukes to simulate chemical and biological weapons

How would that make it more realistic for the modern war? Look at all those weapons they've used so far... :rolleyes:

Maybe you should add a few "planted" US tactical nukes, in the center of Iraqi territory. ;)

Anyway, on a more practical note, you should probably weaken the Iraqi military a little bit in terms of units, but remember the Iraqi army in 1990 was twice as large as the amount of units the US sent over there. So they should have twice as many crappier units as America. I also think that balancing it out so that every side has a chance of winning is a good move. Especially if you can set it up for multiplayer! ;)
 
:-))

I added a bunch more to the IRaqi Military- then played as US, and got Crushed!!! :-(

Overall, great scenario!
 
I just wanted to say that this scenario is great I've changed a few things around to fit my personal needs in the game but it's all around one of the funest scenarios I've played :goodjob:
 
just so you know, Osama bin Laden is not a Great Leader of Iraq. He has no relations with Saddams regime. In fact, 15 of the 19 September 11th hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, and 0 were from Iraq. bin Laden hates Saddam. The only things they have in common is that they are both evil and they both dislike the USA. I'm not pro-Saddam or anti-American, but I didn't support The Second Gulf War and I hate George Bush. He lied to his people. He said that he knew where the so-called Weapons of Mass Destruction were, but he found NOTHING. My point is bin Laden isn't related to Iraq, so he shouldn't be their leader. Instead, put someone like "Uday Hussien" or "Chemical Ali"

BTW, I'd make America's agression level 5; we were attacked, but not by Iraq.
________
Video sex
 
evreyone is entitled to their oppinion thats whats so great about america however you should know that wmd were the main but not the only reason we attacked iraq the other reason was the awful treatment and the oppression of his people and if i'm not mistaken they seemed kinda happy that america helped free them and can't wait until all the troops are home iraq supported terrorism and I believe if we just left the whole situation alone that terrorists might have gotten a hold of some wmd and we'd be in worse shape then 9/11.However I really don't see what this has to do with this game I agree that bin laden had nothing to do with saddam but if you want to put him in the scenario then so be it thats whats so great about freedom the one thing the iraqis didn't have but now do thanks to the sacrafices of the american and british troops I just wanted to state my opinon on this and just hope that we could talk about civ if I wanted to talk or read this stuff I'd go to some message boards...........:rotfl: anyways you still have a good point on things but as I said I think we should talk about civ thats all :D
 
They may already have been brought up, but a few suggestions:

1) Stop the Iraqi access to the Stealth bomber. It just feels weird. Alternatively, call it a 'Su24' or whatever and weaken it.
2) You need to segregate the weapons in the game more. The US should have better armoured firepower than everyone else, there should be a larger difference between Iraqi Armour and other units. Turkey, Iraq and Egypt, for example, used completely different weapons systems.
3) Perhaps give Iraq and Iran some ultra-cheap, maintenance-free but rather weak 'conscript' units and allow them to field vast numbers of them. Alternatively, prevent them from building such conscripts (to prevent oversized armies) but give them a huge amount to start with.
4) Fix the typos. 'Headquarters' and 'Terrorists' should be spelt correctly.
5) Perhaps use Gramphos's all-powerful savegame editing tool. ;)
6) Find a way to prevent everyone from going democratic. Perhaps give only certain nations dmeocracy and make democracy a technology that cannot be traded early in the game (by making it's prerequisite something that will take time to achieve).


Essentially, it is a fun scenario but it could be so much better if you added detail and individual weaponry for many of the nations.

I would really love this scenario to bits if you spruced it up. :)
 
you guys know that the guy that gets saddam gets 50,000,000 US?
 
Hi!

YODA: Could you a bit improve your scenario?
I mean, it would be a great thing, if I (we) could play it with friends(multiplayer). We tried, but the game crashes at the science advisor.

That's all.
 
why cool yoda power! thanks!
 
sorry to double post but saddams finally been caught!
 
sorry..
 
Back
Top Bottom