Israelite9191
You should be reading
I guess I misinterpreted your tone of voice Asclepius, my appoligies. The meaning of my original post was that the Holocaust must be remembered so that similar events would not happen again, in this case mass genocide and preferably all genocide, however I never said that humanity as a whole remembers the Holocaust or has learned its lesson from the Holocaust. That's my whole reason for arguing that more about the Holocuast must be taught, so that people will learn its lesson.
Yes, the Holocaust is not unique in that it was a genocide, but it was unique in the extent and brutality. It is also true that it was not more important, I never used the phrase "more important." My argument is that the Holocaust is the example of genocide with the most documented evidence, the most loss, and the most inhumane actions carried out. By studying the Holocaust people can gain an understanding of what genocide is and apply that knowledge to the understanding of other, less documented, genocides. The horrors of the Rwandan Geocide, Armenian Genocide, Tibetan Genocide, and others must be remembered and people must understand them. The best way to do that is by first coming to deeply understand the Holocaust.
Yes, the Holocaust is not unique in that it was a genocide, but it was unique in the extent and brutality. It is also true that it was not more important, I never used the phrase "more important." My argument is that the Holocaust is the example of genocide with the most documented evidence, the most loss, and the most inhumane actions carried out. By studying the Holocaust people can gain an understanding of what genocide is and apply that knowledge to the understanding of other, less documented, genocides. The horrors of the Rwandan Geocide, Armenian Genocide, Tibetan Genocide, and others must be remembered and people must understand them. The best way to do that is by first coming to deeply understand the Holocaust.