Screenshot analysis!

[Sansa_Stark]

I don't think they ever confirmed how many there would be. I wouldn't expect more than 1 more.

Hopefully not. They need to save some for interesting expansions.

 

[magha77]

Bazaar could work for the Ottomans, Persians and Moroccans. If for Persia, that really increases the likelihood of Shah Abbas of the Safavid dynasty representing the Persian civ this time around.

 

[Red Menace]

Bazaar could work for the Ottomans, Persians and Moroccans. If for Persia, that really increases the likelihood of Shah Abbas of the Safavid dynasty representing the Persian civ this time around.

with multiple leaders confirmed they could do, Cyrus or Darius, for Ancient Persia, and they could do a later era like Shah Abbas. that would be interesting.

 

[SMcM]

with multiple leaders confirmed they could do, Cyrus or Darius, for Ancient Persia, and they could do a later era like Shah Abbas. that would be interesting.

I think this is a good idea. Cyrus and Nader Shah would be my top picks if we had multiple Persian leaders.

 

[Red Menace]

I think this is a good idea. Cyrus and Nader Shah would be my top picks if we had multiple Persian leaders.

the potential is there, we just need them to release a Persian civ first, I was very surprised that they didn't put Persia in the base game, a bad decision in my book.

 

[Redaxe]

the potential is there, we just need them to release a Persian civ first, I was very surprised that they didn't put Persia in the base game, a bad decision in my book.

Yeah but at least it will be added eventually - we can be certain of that.

Of interest though, what would people prefer, Achaemenid Persia or Sassanid Persia?

Both are compelling options.

 

[stealth_nsk]

Yeah but at least it will be added eventually - we can be certain of that.

Of interest though, what would people prefer, Achaemenid Persia or Sassanid Persia?

Both are compelling options.

I'd prefer 1 leader from each

Muslim Persia is cool too, but those 2 are better, IMHO.

 

[Haig]

I think Russian Krepost could replace encampment.

 

[stealth_nsk]

I think Russian Krepost could replace encampment.

Krepost was in Civ5, so I don't think they'll repeat this. And even if they do, Ostrog would be much better name as "Krepost" means just "Fortress".

 

[Atlas627]

I'd prefer 1 leader from each

In the "Design a Civ" thread, I made a Persia with 1 Sassanid ruler and 2 Achaemenid rulers. I think the Sassanid period is overlooked.

 

[Haig]

stealth: ok Ostrog was new to me

 

[George Abitbol]

I think Russian Krepost could replace encampment.

"Kremlin" could be an interesting encampment replacement, since it's a generic term for "fortress".

 

[Gorbles]

"Kremlin" could be an interesting encampment replacement, since it's a generic term for "fortress".

It might be a generic term in pure linguistic terms, but the cultural attachment the proper noun (Kremlin, vs. kremlin) has renders it too important - especially in recent modern foreign history alone - to be used in a generic context, I feel.

 

[Zaarin]

It might be a generic term in pure linguistic terms, but the cultural attachment the proper noun (Kremlin, vs. kremlin) has renders it too important - especially in recent modern foreign history alone - to be used in a generic context, I feel.

On the plus side, the in-game wonder "Kremlin" could be replaced with St. Basil's Cathedral.

 

[Metecury]

If anyone should get an encampment replacement it's Rome. The campus martius is a perfect example.

 

[Seek]

New wonder in the Gandhi video? @ 1:06

 

[Hutchy27]

New wonder in the Gandhi video? @ 1:06

Spoiler :

[

/QUOTE]

The encampment district?

 

[Seek]

The encampment district?

Ah, yep - with a stables, got thrown off by no barracks.

 

[shyPiano]

The encampment district?

Most likely the Encampment district, yes - the red roofs and tents give that away. Probably one with an Armory (or whatever the third building for the encampment is)

 

[BenZL43]

the 3rd building is Military Academy