Morganknight
Warlord
Ok, pardon my terminology. I meant that those particular forests should not be cut down, not that we should build preserves there later. My apologies.
Here is my proposed turn set:
0. This turn - we apply 25 research to Lit for a total of 54. Wake worker and send it along the yellow arrow to the first red circle. Start prechopping.
1. 54/100 GP. Next turn - Library is finished, switch production to an axeman, revolt to Representation and Slavery. 0 research. 0 production.
2. 54/100 GP. 33.75 research, 11 hammers (87.75/286 Literature)(11/35 Axeman)
3. 62/100 GP. 33.75 research, 11 hammers (121.50/286 Literature)(22/35 Axeman)
4. 70/100 GP. 33.75 research, 11 hammers (155.25/286 Literature)(33/35 Axeman)
5. 78/100 GP. Switch production to Research - 48.75 research (204/286 Literature)
6. 86/100 GP. 48.75 research (252.75/286 Literature)
7. 94/100 GP. Switch production to ?(*) - 33.75 research, 11 hammers (286.5/286 Literature)(11/? ?(*))
8. 102/100 GP. -We should get our first GP this turn, if it is an Engineer, we have to use him to pop the GL and the rest of this set is moot.- Literature researched, switch research to ?(**), queue up axeman and GL and whip, finish chop - 77 hammers (35/35 Axeman, 187.5/350 GL)
9. Move worker - 17 hammers (230/350 GL)
10. Finish chop, starve a little - 50 hammers (355/350 GL)
11. GL finished

Btw, fraction system is used in bts, not here.
queue up axeman and GL and whip, finish chop - 77 hammers (35/35 Axeman, 187.5/350 GL)

Hello gents.
There is one option not considered here btw, and that is a surgical strike. Without looking into it I'm not sure if we can do that but, it is an option. Possibly. Even the WAR declaration might help..?
Our only warrior on a brave crusade against the English?

I might be missing something - but how do we *know* that Liz is building GL ? Easy enough to know she has Lit and Marble, but I don't understand how you know she's building GL.
I think we should play as though she is of course
I believe its 100% certain we will receive a Great Engineer - but I loath to use him for GL just to save 2-3 turns (unless its 99.99% sure Elizabeth will build it in those turns, even on Deity how good is the computer at optimising for a goal like this?). The input of the GE in our city over this game will be invaluable.

efficient anyway, so what we are really losing if we rush a partial GL build with a GE is the
that were put into the partial build. I can live with that in exchange for locking up the GL. Using the GE to shave 2 or 3 turns may not be optimal, but the flip side of that is missing the wonder by 2 or 3 turns despite having an available GE. That second possibility is a scary proposition, TBH.I believe its 100% certain we will receive a Great Engineer - but I loath to use him for GL just to save 2-3 turns (unless its 99.99% sure Elizabeth will build it in those turns, even on Deity how good is the computer at optimising for a goal like this?). The input of the GE in our city over this game will be invaluable.




. It is probably the same thing, but we should check it. This way is safer. Maximize production, commerce and research with -1 
[(25+12)*1.25 = 46, check it out]












)

(This means 45 overflow. This number must stay under 60
. No chopping here or rest goes to gold!)

(45 overflow+16 base)*2.5
. Now, we can make a chop and make 20 base
with some starvation:
Do you see some mistakes?
Btw, are those figures I posted correct so far? Please post a city screenshot or attach a save on our team thread.

have units within our borders?How about open borders? No? He's Buddhist. Would having OB with him increase our chances of snagging Buddhism? Even if it did, would it be worth it to let this lunatichave units within our borders?

This is an interesting question because the reason Liz is unwilling to trade Lit is "We don't want to trade away this technology just yet,"

The GL is more valuable than a settled GE.