Originally posted by Simon Darkshade
There is a difference between acting like a headless chicken, and examining the possible permutations of the occurence. As one said previously, the initial thought was to terrorism, given the 'co-incidences', but that was qualified by saying that full judgement would be withheld until more information came to hand.
Now that the information has come to hand, it looks more like a lone wolf.
It is true that the purpose of terrorism is to terrorize, and that the echo of past events is with us still.