Should LGBT themes be discused in sexual education class for children?

And you have to bring up the bait-word... Disapproval does not a phobia make.
 
Domination3000 said:
They shouldn't do it because they shouldn't teach people how to sin.
Click to expand...

In your eyes, but would you rather live a life of sin or lies? I'd say sin, because sin is objective.

Its not like they will teach the "how to" of sex, parents of children of 13 will object regardless of there view on LGBT. As long as these programs teach children to be tolerant of LGBT I think there will be no problem. Unless people have problems with LGBT community.

"Today children we are going to talk about An... Sex, the pros ,the cons of this style of sex"
 
VRWCAgent said:
And you have to bring up the bait-word... Disapproval does not a phobia make.
Click to expand...

I actually think bringing up homophobia is a good thing. We adults can see the difference between disapproval and hate, but children are cruel and will ostracize and possibly beat up those that don't conform. I think we need to make homosexuality "normal" at the same time we explain sexuality for children.
 
I see no benefit at all in discussing transgenders. I really don't see any advantage or benefit from discussing homosexuality either, but meh I just cannot muster the righteous anger to care anymore about that. Transgenders, though? Yeah, can't say I care for kids being taught about guys wanting to dress and pretend they are women and vice versa as a regular lifestyle.
Click to expand...

Transgender and Intersex people are not necessarily the same as drag queens. They are born with both gentalia usually one functioning and the other malformed, sometimes the parent will choose the gender they want at birth and it's surgically corrected which leads to all sorts of complications later in life involving identity, hence sex change operations. Drag queens are men who dress as women. You can be a transgender man and not a drag queen, and you can be a straight man who is a drag queen.
 
VRWCAgent said:
And you have to bring up the bait-word... Disapproval does not a phobia make.
Click to expand...

Sorry for quoting you twice, but they could handle it like they handle evolution in biology class. They say why evolution is generally supported, but they don't force you to think that way if you personally disapprove of it. They could say why homosexuality is generally accepted, but not force you personally to accept it if you don't want to so long as you are not offensive or discriminating.
 
The point of school is to educate. It's only a matter of time before these kids are confronted with LGBT people or even the feelings themselves, and it's important they understand it when they do. Everyone should be made aware of the difficulties these people face in society so that cruelty and bigotry can be phased out.
 
Yes. Children should be told about the degeneracy of the so-called "LGBT" movement and its close ties to CIA and Mossad. Children should be told that the brave people who defended Holy Russia against the Mongols, against the Polish, against the French, against the Germans, against the whole evil We$t, were not "LGBT"! Not a single one of them! :gripe:
 
Domination3000 said:
They shouldn't do it because they shouldn't teach people how to sin.
Click to expand...

Sex education doesn't teach children how to have sex*, it teaches them how to be safe when having sex. An important distinction.

[* It may well cover some of the mechanics that should have already been covered in biology, but this is not its purpose.]
 
Lone Wolf said:
Yes. Children should be told about the degeneracy of the so-called "LGBT" movement and its close ties to CIA and Mossad. Children should be told that the brave people who defended Holy Russia against the Mongols, against the Polish, against the French, against the Germans, against the whole evil We$t, were not "LGBT"! Not a single one of them! :gripe:
Click to expand...

Tchaikovsky?
 
Tchaikovsky?
Click to expand...
Your rhetorical question is a grave threat to the morality of the Russian nation. I think that FBI should immediately start interrogating you :scan: :gripe:
 
I want a link that shows anybody is seriously proposing to teach this like the OP suggests.
 
berkut said:
Politicians are discussing here a plan to promote LGBT rights that grants scholarship for LGBT students, and a share for LGBT teaches in public schools. The project also recomends the discussion of sexual diversity for children during alphabetization, and also includes a national anti aids campain that teach gay and lesbian sex to thirteen years old students and how to do it safe.

So what do you think of this?
Click to expand...
Moderator Action: I'm putting a temp lock on this pending the OP PM'ing me w/ a reputable link to provide some context for the discussion.

At that point, I'll either unlock it and allow them to edit in the link or have a new thread initiated. Another option is to have the OP post the link to the already existing, similar thread.
 
VRWCAgent said:
I see no benefit at all in discussing transgenders. I really don't see any advantage or benefit from discussing homosexuality either, but meh I just cannot muster the righteous anger to care anymore about that. Transgenders, though? Yeah, can't say I care for kids being taught about guys wanting to dress and pretend they are women and vice versa as a regular lifestyle.
Click to expand...

Well, it's not difficult to teach a gender-neutral sex-ed class by simply referring to the type of penetrative (or other) sex in question.
 
Karalysia said:
Transgender and Intersex people are not necessarily the same as drag queens. They are born with both gentalia usually one functioning and the other malformed, sometimes the parent will choose the gender they want at birth and it's surgically corrected which leads to all sorts of complications later in life involving identity, hence sex change operations. Drag queens are men who dress as women. You can be a transgender man and not a drag queen, and you can be a straight man who is a drag queen.
Click to expand...

Transgender and intersex are not the same thing. What you described is intersex. Intersex individuals do not always experience such complications later in life. Transgender individuals are not usually intersex.
 
Domination3000 said:
They shouldn't do it because they shouldn't teach people how to sin.
Click to expand...

Bah.

Homosexuality is no sin, regardless of what anyone else may say; though, I like to believe I work in the ways or absolute morals, subjected by whether it hurts people or not rather then some psuedo moral or sins.

Homosexuality is hardly a sin as it is has no inherit threat to anyone under average circumstances, and unless you can argue otherwise that is my feeling.
 
berkut said:
Politicians are discussing here a plan to promote LGBT rights that grants scholarship for LGBT students, and a share for LGBT teaches in public schools. The project also recomends the discussion of sexual diversity for children during alphabetization, and also includes a national anti aids campain that teach gay and lesbian sex to thirteen years old students and how to do it safe.

So what do you think of this?
Click to expand...
Are the scholarships specifically for LGBT students? For if they are I can only see that as promoting discrimination.

I also see it as a waste of time to spend time teaching sexual diversity specifically ,because I think students could be tought something more beneficial.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom