BassDude726
It's Just a Phase
Ironically, the first person to ever run a marathon died. (after the Greeks defeated the persians at marathon, he ran the 26-point-whatever miles to Athens to tell the good news, we all know the story).
Sanaz said:I think the point may be, there is no logic in the comparison? Or it is a very lame attempt to prove that drugs should be legalized? It would be par for the course, I've never seen a good argument made to legalize drugs. I think the people wanting to legalize drugs never bothered learning how to form logical opinions of the world.
Ultraworld said:Should we forbid people to run marathons and make journeys to the north-pole. After all it is bad for your body and an outrage on your health (at least for most white people), an argument used to forbid hard-drugs.
That's the most unusual justification of drug laws I've ever heard in my lifeBen E Gas said:The drugs harm others around you (ie illegal drug trafficing)
By "discouraged" I meant along the lines of TV commercials.IglooDude said:Certainly, as soon as you elaborate on the methods of discouraging marathon running. Are you going to tax it somehow, perhaps a steep tax on running shoes? Television commercials that enunciate the medical dangers? Require a license to run more than ten miles without an hour of rest? Go to schools and educate kids (I'm thinking something like a visual presentation with "These are your knees. These are your knees after a marathon.") I have a difficult time with the more stringent "discouragement" as the laws required will be unwieldy , or unenforceable, or overly broad. I have a difficult time with the less stringent "discouragement" as given the prevalent health dangers in this country, telling people they shouldn't run long distances will be about as effective as telling people that more than eight glasses of water a day can be unhealthy while most people drink far too little water.
----
I guess I'm just baffled at the attitude that the public needs to be educated about the benefits and risks of a relatively inocuous activity (relative, that is, to swimming, smoking, driving, drinking, etc etc etc). Indeed, where do you draw the line?
Dr Jimbo said:Ultraworld - get real. Marathon runners are in better shape than the rest of us, and likely to live longer.
BassDude726 said:No one is saying that marathon running doesn't have drawbacks. Bad for your joints, but excellent for your cardiovascular system and your lungs.
These things quite simply aren't (probably) true, and in fact basically the reverse of what CG said is true. (According to the link I posted, at least.) Marathon running itself is a healthy activity, but it is so extreme that it requires lengthy, intense, and "correct" preparation. If you don't prepare well enough, you'll harm yourself (obviously not kill yourself, though). Just like lifting heavy weights. And many marathon runners don't pepare well enough.cgannon64 said:I don't think many unhealthy people die in marathons. The people who die are probably the true athletes who actually did push themselves too much.
Well, it's not that they'll drop dead in the middle of the thing by overexerting themselves. If I'm not mistaken, pretty much everyone either gives up or finishes (no one really dies), and many of the people who manage to finish probably shouldn't have bothered finishing, because going the distance was unhealthy for them (although this isn't always easily noticeable; they don't collapse afterwards or anything).cgannon64 said:Well...you suck, WillJ.
Actually, I should rephrase. Those who don't train at all aren't going to die in a marathon, because they'll give up. Those who train somewhat, but not enough, may die, because they think they are good enough to finish, but they aren't.
stratego said:Yes we should. I'm horribly ill right now due to second hand running. And why else would someone run to the northpole but to beat their wives and kids?